
GeForce RTX 4070

Radeon RX 6300
GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon RX 6300 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon RX 6300 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon RX 6300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅276.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌898.3% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$60 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 44.9 vs 88.7 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
- ❌471.4% higher power demand at 200W vs 35W.
- ❌90% longer card at 304mm vs 160mm.
Radeon RX 6300
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $539 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 97.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 88.7 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 200W, a 165W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 304mm, a 144mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon RX 6300 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon RX 6300
The Radeon RX 6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,319 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Radeon RX 6300's 5,319 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 406.1%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 6300 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6300). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 2400 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12 (Radeon RX 6300) with 184 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+406% | 5,319 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+667% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+691% | 3.686 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+3% | 2400 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 184+283% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+2220% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+3500% | 1 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+283% | 12 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation, but they get there through different ecosystems. The GeForce RTX 4070 uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 6300 relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can help smooth out supported games, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 6300 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6300 carries 4 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 64 GB/s (Radeon RX 6300) — a 687.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 and 32-bit on the Radeon RX 6300. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6300) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+200% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s+688% | 64 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+500% | 32-bit |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+3500% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12_2 (Radeon RX 6300). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12_2 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6300). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Radeon RX 6300's 35W — a 140.4% difference. The Radeon RX 6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 300W (Radeon RX 6300). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 160mm, occupying 3 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 35W-83% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 300W-54% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 160mm |
| Height | 137mm | — |
| Slots | 3 | 1-67% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6 | 152.0+13% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 came in at $599, while the Radeon RX 6300 launched at $60. On MSRP, Radeon RX 6300 was 90% cheaper ($539 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 88.7 (Radeon RX 6300) — the Radeon RX 6300 offers 97.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $60-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9 | 88.7+98% |
| Codename | AD104 | Navi 24 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #32 | #379 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














