
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 640
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1139.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 229% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 13.7 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌300% higher power demand at 200W vs 50W.
Radeon RX 640
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $440 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 200W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,172 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.7 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Radeon RX 640
2019Why buy it
- ✅+1139.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 229% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 13.7 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $440 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 200W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌300% higher power demand at 200W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,172 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.7 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than Radeon RX 640?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 640 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 640 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 640 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 21 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 4 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 640 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 24 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 640 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 24 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Radeon RX 640

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon RX 640
Radeon RX 640
The Radeon RX 640 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,172 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Radeon RX 640's 2,172 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 1139.4%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 640 uses GCN 4.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 640 (Radeon RX 640). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1.559 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 640). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1218 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 640 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+1139% | 2,172 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+820% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+1770% | 1.559 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+103% | 1218 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 184+360% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+3525% | 0.16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+7100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4070 uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 640 relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 640 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 640 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon RX 640) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 640 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+200% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+7100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12 (FL 12_0) (Radeon RX 640). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 640 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (FL 12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 640). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 640).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Radeon RX 640's 50W — a 120% difference. The Radeon RX 640 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (Radeon RX 640). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 640 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 50W-75% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | — |
| Height | 137mm | — |
| Slots | 3 | 1-67% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+210% | 43.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 640 launched at $159. The Radeon RX 640 costs 73.5% less ($440 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 13.7 (Radeon RX 640) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 227.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 640 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $159-73% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+228% | 13.7 |
| Codename | AD104 | Polaris 23 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #32 | #665 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












