G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅20.2% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 200W instead of 230W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.

Radeon RX 6700 XT

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $120 less on MSRP ($479 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌15% higher power demand at 230W vs 200W.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Radeon RX 6700 XT

2021

Why buy it

✅20.2% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 200W instead of 230W, a 30W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Costs $120 less on MSRP ($479 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌15% higher power demand at 230W vs 200W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than Radeon RX 6700 XT?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 20.2% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data, 36.3% higher PassMark G3D performance, and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. It also comes from 2023 instead of 2021, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2021, 36.3% more raw performance headroom, the stronger feature stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation instead of FSR 3 + AFMF, and a 5nm process instead of 7nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4070 is about 25.1% more expensive on MSRP at $599 MSRP versus $479 MSRP, and you are getting 20.2% more estimated average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data and 36.3% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 9%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon RX 6700 XT still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon RX 6700 XT is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $479 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4070 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 6700 XT Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon RX 6700 XT
1080p
low	183 FPS	179 FPS
medium	167 FPS	159 FPS
high	151 FPS	145 FPS
ultra	131 FPS	122 FPS
1440p
low	150 FPS	145 FPS
medium	124 FPS	117 FPS
high	110 FPS	108 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	97 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	87 FPS
medium	78 FPS	73 FPS
high	65 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	52 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Radeon RX 6700 XT

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon RX 6700 XT
1080p
low	544 FPS	479 FPS
medium	454 FPS	405 FPS
high	353 FPS	326 FPS
ultra	299 FPS	274 FPS
1440p
low	351 FPS	298 FPS
medium	288 FPS	246 FPS
high	235 FPS	206 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	173 FPS
4K
low	172 FPS	131 FPS
medium	144 FPS	112 FPS
high	125 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	70 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Radeon RX 6700 XT

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon RX 6700 XT
1080p
low	884 FPS	867 FPS
medium	713 FPS	705 FPS
high	643 FPS	593 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	444 FPS
1440p
low	684 FPS	663 FPS
medium	549 FPS	532 FPS
high	483 FPS	444 FPS
ultra	424 FPS	333 FPS
4K
low	467 FPS	444 FPS
medium	373 FPS	356 FPS
high	326 FPS	296 FPS
ultra	277 FPS	222 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Radeon RX 6700 XT

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon RX 6700 XT
1080p
low	751 FPS	703 FPS
medium	612 FPS	585 FPS
high	536 FPS	491 FPS
ultra	497 FPS	412 FPS
1440p
low	615 FPS	541 FPS
medium	500 FPS	451 FPS
high	433 FPS	367 FPS
ultra	395 FPS	308 FPS
4K
low	384 FPS	322 FPS
medium	324 FPS	285 FPS
high	301 FPS	257 FPS
ultra	272 FPS	210 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Radeon RX 6700 XT

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Radeon RX 6700 XT

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon RX 6700 XT

The Radeon RX 6700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2321 MHz to 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,754 points. Launch price was $479.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Radeon RX 6700 XT's 19,754 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 36.3%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 6700 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2,560 (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 13.21 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 2581 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 40 (Radeon RX 6700 XT) with 184 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon RX 6700 XT
G3D Mark Score	26,919+36%	19,754
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	5 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	5888+130%	2560
Compute (TFLOPS)	29.15 TFLOPS+121%	13.21 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2475 MHz	2581 MHz+4%
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	184+15%	160
L1 Cache	5.8 MB+1060%	0.5 MB
L2 Cache	36 MB+1100%	3 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	46+15%	40

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4070 uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 6700 XT relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6700 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon RX 6700 XT
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR 3
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 12 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 384 GB/s (Radeon RX 6700 XT) — a 31.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 6700 XT) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon RX 6700 XT
VRAM Capacity	12 GB	12 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	504 GB/s+31%	384 GB/s
Bus Width	192-bit	192-bit
L2 Cache	36 MB+1100%	3 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon RX 6700 XT
DirectX	12.2+2%	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs VCE (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (Radeon RX 6700 XT).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon RX 6700 XT
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC (2x)	VCE
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	UVD
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Radeon RX 6700 XT's 230W — a 14% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 650W (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 304mm vs 267mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon RX 6700 XT
TDP	200W-13%	230W
Recommended PSU	650W	650W
Power Connector	8-pin	6-pin + 8-pin
Length	304mm	267mm
Height	137mm	110mm
Slots	3	2-33%
Temp (Load)	80°C	75°C-6%
Perf/Watt	134.6+57%	85.9

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6700 XT launched at $479. The Radeon RX 6700 XT costs 20% less ($120 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 41.2 (Radeon RX 6700 XT) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 9% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).