
GeForce RTX 4070

Radeon RX 6750 XT
GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon RX 6750 XT Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon RX 6750 XT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon RX 6750 XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅19.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 19.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 37.7 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 250W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.
Radeon RX 6750 XT
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 37.7 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌25% higher power demand at 250W vs 200W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon RX 6750 XT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon RX 6750 XT
The Radeon RX 6750 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 3 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2150 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,686 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Radeon RX 6750 XT's 20,686 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 30.1%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 6750 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2,560 (Radeon RX 6750 XT). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 13.31 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6750 XT). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 2600 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 40 (Radeon RX 6750 XT) with 184 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+30% | 20,686 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+130% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+119% | 13.31 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz | 2600 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+15% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+1060% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+1100% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+15% | 40 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation, but they get there through different ecosystems. The GeForce RTX 4070 uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 6750 XT relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can help smooth out supported games, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 6750 XT leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 12 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 432 GB/s (Radeon RX 6750 XT) — a 16.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 and 192-bit on the Radeon RX 6750 XT. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 6750 XT) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s+17% | 432 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+1100% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6750 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6750 XT). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only),VP9 (Radeon RX 6750 XT).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only),VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Radeon RX 6750 XT's 250W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 650W (Radeon RX 6750 XT). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 304mm vs 267mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-20% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 304mm | 267mm |
| Height | 137mm | — |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+63% | 82.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 came in at $599, while the Radeon RX 6750 XT launched at $549. On MSRP, Radeon RX 6750 XT was 8.3% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 37.7 (Radeon RX 6750 XT) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 19.1% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $549-8% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+19% | 37.7 |
| Codename | AD104 | Navi 22 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | March 3 2022 |
| Ranking | #32 | #70 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














