
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅+454.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 85.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 24.3 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $399 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,852 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 24.3 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
2020Why buy it
- ✅+454.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 85.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 24.3 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $399 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,852 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 24.3 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 55 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 55 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 55 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.


Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,852 points. Launch price was $579.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H's 4,852 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 454.8%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 3,840 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 16.17 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 2105 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 60 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H) with 184 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+455% | 4,852 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+53% | 3840 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+80% | 16.17 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+18% | 2105 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 184 | 240+30% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+673% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+800% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 60+30% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 4 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+500% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+800% | 4 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H's 250W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-20% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | None |
| Length | 304mm | — |
| Height | 137mm | — |
| Slots | 3 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+594% | 19.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H launched at $200. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H costs 66.6% less ($399 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 24.3 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 84.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $200-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+85% | 24.3 |
| Codename | AD104 | Navi 21 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #32 | #65 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













