GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon X1650 GTO

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon X1650 GTO FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon X1650 GTO: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅9512.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 8888% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0.5 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅2300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon X1650 GTO

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $449 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.5 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 9512.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 35792% in PassMark G3D (26,919 vs 75), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 12 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, native frame generation with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while Radeon X1650 GTO has no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 7nm, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2022. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4070 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $449 more expensive on MSRP at $599 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 8888% (44.9 vs 0.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon X1650 GTO Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon X1650 GTO

The Radeon X1650 GTO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1925 MHz to 2324 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 335W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 75 points. Launch price was $1,099.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Radeon X1650 GTO's 75 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 35792%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon X1650 GTO uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 5,120 (Radeon X1650 GTO). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 23.8 TFLOPS (Radeon X1650 GTO). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 2324 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 80 (Radeon X1650 GTO) with 184 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon X1650 GTO
G3D Mark Score	26,919+35792%	75
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	5 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	5888+15%	5120
Compute (TFLOPS)	29.15 TFLOPS+22%	23.8 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2475 MHz+6%	2324 MHz
ROPs	64	128+100%
TMUs	184	320+74%
L1 Cache	5.8 MB+480%	1 MB
L2 Cache	36 MB+800%	4 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	46	80+74%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon X1650 GTO does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon X1650 GTO leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon X1650 GTO
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1650 GTO carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 2300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1650 GTO. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 4 MB (Radeon X1650 GTO) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon X1650 GTO
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+2300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR5
Bus Width	192-bit+200%	64-bit
L2 Cache	36 MB+800%	4 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Radeon X1650 GTO's 335W — a 50.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (Radeon X1650 GTO). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon X1650 GTO
TDP	200W-40%	335W
Recommended PSU	650W	350W-46%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	304mm	—
Height	137mm	—
Slots	3	—
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	134.6+67200%	0.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 came in at $599, while the Radeon X1650 GTO launched at $150. On MSRP, Radeon X1650 GTO was 75% cheaper ($449 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 0.5 (Radeon X1650 GTO) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 8880% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2022).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon X1650 GTO
MSRP	$599	$150-75%
Performance per Dollar	44.9+8880%	0.5
Codename	AD104	Navi 21
Release	April 12 2023	May 10 2022
Ranking	#32	#25

Search GeForce RTX 4070 on Amazon

Search Radeon X1650 GTO on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.