GeForce RTX 4070
Radeon X1950 GT
GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon X1950 GT Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon X1950 GT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon X1950 GT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅9512.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 5835.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $140 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅2300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌32.2% longer card at 304mm vs 230mm.
Radeon X1950 GT
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $459 less on MSRP ($140 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 230mm instead of 304mm, a 74mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.8 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($140 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon X1950 GT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Radeon X1950 GT
The Radeon X1950 GT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1925 MHz to 2324 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 335W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 106 points. Launch price was $1,099.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Radeon X1950 GT's 106 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 25295.3%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon X1950 GT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 5,120 (Radeon X1950 GT). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 23.8 TFLOPS (Radeon X1950 GT). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 2324 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 80 (Radeon X1950 GT) with 184 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+25295% | 106 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+15% | 5120 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+22% | 23.8 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+6% | 2324 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 128+100% |
| TMUs | 184 | 320+74% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+480% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+800% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 80+74% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon X1950 GT does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon X1950 GT leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1950 GT carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 2300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1950 GT. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 4 MB (Radeon X1950 GT) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+2300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+800% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 9_0c (Radeon X1950 GT). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+36% | 9_0c |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs Avivo (Radeon X1950 GT). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs Avivo.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | Avivo |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | Avivo |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Radeon X1950 GT's 335W — a 50.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (Radeon X1950 GT). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 230mm, occupying 3 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-40% | 335W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 230mm |
| Height | 137mm | — |
| Slots | 3 | 1-67% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+44767% | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 came in at $599, while the Radeon X1950 GT launched at $140. On MSRP, Radeon X1950 GT was 76.6% cheaper ($459 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 0.8 (Radeon X1950 GT) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 5512.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $140-77% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+5513% | 0.8 |
| Codename | AD104 | Navi 21 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | May 10 2022 |
| Ranking | #32 | #25 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4070 and Radeon X1950 GT
