GeForce RTX 4070
RADEON X600 PRO
GeForce RTX 4070 vs RADEON X600 PRO Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4070 vs RADEON X600 PRO FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4070 vs RADEON X600 PRO: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅9512.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 6540.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0.7 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅2300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.
- ❌78.8% longer card at 304mm vs 170mm.
RADEON X600 PRO
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $500 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Measures 170mm instead of 304mm, a 134mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.7 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4070 vs RADEON X600 PRO Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
RADEON X600 PRO
The RADEON X600 PRO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the RADEON X600 PRO's 67 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 40077.6%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RADEON X600 PRO uses RDNA 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2,048 (RADEON X600 PRO). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 6.39 TFLOPS (RADEON X600 PRO). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+40078% | 67 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+188% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+356% | 6.39 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+59% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+44% | 128 |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+1100% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The RADEON X600 PRO does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON X600 PRO leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the RADEON X600 PRO carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 2300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 and 64-bit on the RADEON X600 PRO. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 3 MB (RADEON X600 PRO) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+2300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+1100% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs None (RADEON X600 PRO). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs MPEG-2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,WMV9 (RADEON X600 PRO).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | None |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | MPEG-2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,WMV9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the RADEON X600 PRO's 150W — a 28.6% difference. The RADEON X600 PRO is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (RADEON X600 PRO). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Legacy. Card length: 304mm vs 170mm, occupying 3 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 150W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Legacy |
| Length | 304mm | 170mm |
| Height | 137mm | 65mm |
| Slots | 3 | 1-67% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+33550% | 0.4 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 came in at $599, while the RADEON X600 PRO launched at $99. On MSRP, RADEON X600 PRO was 83.5% cheaper ($500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 0.7 (RADEON X600 PRO) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 6314.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $99-83% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+6314% | 0.7 |
| Codename | AD104 | Navi 10 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | January 21 2020 |
| Ranking | #32 | #216 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4070 and RADEON X600 PRO
