
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

RTX 2000E Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅+76.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 194.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌185.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 70W.
- ❌82% longer card at 304mm vs 167mm.
RTX 2000E Ada Generation
2024Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 200W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 304mm, a 137mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (15,252 vs 26,919).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌66.8% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.3 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023RTX 2000E Ada Generation
2024Why buy it
- ✅+76.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 194.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 200W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 304mm, a 137mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌185.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 70W.
- ❌82% longer card at 304mm vs 167mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (15,252 vs 26,919).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌66.8% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.3 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than RTX 2000E Ada Generation?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX 2000E Ada Generation make more sense than GeForce RTX 4070?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 68 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 342 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 217 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 59 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 686 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 549 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 458 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 343 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 456 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 385 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 326 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 257 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 335 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 163 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 617 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 538 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 343 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 412 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 343 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 257 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 311 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 275 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 172 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and RTX 2000E Ada Generation

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX 2000E Ada Generation
RTX 2000E Ada Generation
The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,252 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the RTX 2000E Ada Generation's 15,252 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 76.5%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 2000E Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2,816 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 2130 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 22 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) with 184 Tensor cores vs 88.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+76% | 15,252 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+109% | 2816 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+143% | 12 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+16% | 2130 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 184+109% | 88 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+107% | 2.8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+200% | 12 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+109% | 22 |
| Tensor Cores | 184+109% | 88 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX 2000E Ada Generation lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 2000E Ada Generation supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 2000E Ada Generation has 16 GB. The RTX 2000E Ada Generation offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 224 GB/s (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) — a 125% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12 MB (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s+125% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+200% | 12 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.2 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the RTX 2000E Ada Generation's 70W — a 96.3% difference. The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 650W (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 167mm, occupying 3 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 70W-65% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 167mm |
| Height | 137mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 3 | 1-67% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6 | 217.9+62% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the RTX 2000E Ada Generation launched at $999. The GeForce RTX 4070 costs 40% less ($400 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 15.3 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 193.5% better value. The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-40% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+193% | 15.3 |
| Codename | AD104 | AD107 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | February 12 2024 |
| Ranking | #32 | #107 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












