GeForce RTX 4070 vs RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅15.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌73.9% higher power demand at 200W vs 115W.

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 115W instead of 200W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 15.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 69.9% in PassMark G3D (26,919 vs 15,848), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 12 GB vs 8 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is limited to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) and no comparable frame-generation support, and 46 vs 36 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4070 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,848 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 15,848 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 69.9%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 4,608 (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 15.62 TFLOPS (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 2000 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 36 (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) with 184 Tensor cores vs 144.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
G3D Mark Score	26,919+70%	15,848
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	5 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	5888+28%	4608
Compute (TFLOPS)	29.15 TFLOPS+87%	15.62 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2475 MHz+24%	2000 MHz
ROPs	64+33%	48
TMUs	184+28%	144
L1 Cache	5.8 MB+29%	4.5 MB
L2 Cache	36 MB+13%	32 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	46+28%	36
Tensor Cores	184+28%	144

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 256 GB/s (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — a 96.9% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 and 128-bit on the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 32 MB (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+50%	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	504 GB/s+97%	256 GB/s
Bus Width	192-bit+50%	128-bit
L2 Cache	36 MB+13%	32 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.2 (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC (2x)	8th Gen NVENC
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 115W — a 54% difference. The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 650W (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 0mm, occupying 3 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
TDP	200W	115W-43%
Recommended PSU	650W	650W
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	304mm	0mm
Height	137mm	0mm
Slots	3	0-100%
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	134.6	137.8+2%