
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅34.6% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌100% higher power demand at 200W vs 100W.
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 200W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅34.6% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 200W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌100% higher power demand at 200W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 28 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 379 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 327 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 265 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 230 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 72 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 826 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 680 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 590 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 628 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 332 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 406 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 212 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 301 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 260 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 217 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 79 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,656 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 19,656 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 37%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 5,120 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 15.82 TFLOPS (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1545 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 40 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) with 184 Tensor cores vs 160.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+37% | 19,656 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+15% | 5120 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+84% | 15.82 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+60% | 1545 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+15% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+16% | 5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB | 48 MB+33% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+15% | 40 |
| Tensor Cores | 184+15% | 160 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 12 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 432 GB/s (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — a 16.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 48 MB (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s+17% | 432 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB | 48 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs NVENC 8th gen (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 150W (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 100W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 150W-77% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 304mm | — |
| Height | 137mm | — |
| Slots | 3 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6 | 196.6+46% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












