G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅81.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅187.5% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (184 vs 64).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌471.4% higher power demand at 200W vs 35W.

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

2024

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 200W, a 165W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (64 vs 184), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
❌GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 81.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 141.2% in PassMark G3D (26,919 vs 11,162), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 12 GB vs 8 GB of VRAM and 46 vs 16 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4070 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 26 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 2025 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,162 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile's 11,162 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 141.2%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2,048 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 8.294 TFLOPS (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 2025 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 16 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) with 184 Tensor cores vs 64.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
G3D Mark Score	26,919+141%	11,162
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	5 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	5888+188%	2048
Compute (TFLOPS)	29.15 TFLOPS+251%	8.294 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2475 MHz+22%	2025 MHz
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	184+188%	64
L1 Cache	5.8 MB+190%	2 MB
L2 Cache	36 MB+200%	12 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	46+188%	16
Tensor Cores	184+188%	64

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both cards support Frame Generation, but the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is on the newer stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation, while the GeForce RTX 4070 stays on DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	DLSS 4 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation+14%
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	Yes (DLSS 4)+14%
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 128 GB/s (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) — a 293.8% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 and 64-bit on the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12 MB (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+50%	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	504 GB/s+294%	128 GB/s
Bus Width	192-bit+200%	64-bit
L2 Cache	36 MB+200%	12 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12 (12_2) (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
DirectX	12.2+2%	12 (12_2)
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC (2x)	8th Gen NVENC
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile's 35W — a 140.4% difference. The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 500W (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
TDP	200W	35W-83%
Recommended PSU	650W	500W-23%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	304mm	—
Height	137mm	—
Slots	3	0-100%
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	134.6	318.9+137%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile (2024 vs 2023).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
MSRP	$599	—
Codename	AD104	AD107
Release	April 12 2023	February 26 2024
Ranking	#32	#254

Search GeForce RTX 4070 on Amazon

Search RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.