GeForce RTX 4070 vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅+32.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 400), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

2023

Why buy it

✅11.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅117.4% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (400 vs 184).
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (20,312 vs 26,919).
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 11.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce RTX 4070 instead at 26,919 vs 20,312, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4070 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2550 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 32.5%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12,800 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 2550 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 100 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) with 184 Tensor cores vs 400.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
G3D Mark Score	26,919+33%	20,312
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	5 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	5888	12800+117%
Compute (TFLOPS)	29.15 TFLOPS	65.28 TFLOPS+124%
Boost Clock	2475 MHz	2550 MHz+3%
ROPs	64	176+175%
TMUs	184	400+117%
L1 Cache	5.8 MB	12.5 MB+116%
L2 Cache	36 MB	72 MB+100%
Ray Tracing Cores	46	100+117%
Tensor Cores	184	400+117%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both cards support Frame Generation, but the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is on the newer stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation, while the GeForce RTX 4070 stays on DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	DLSS 4 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation+14%
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	Yes (DLSS 4)+14%
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU carries 16 GB. RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 576 GB/s (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) — a 14.3% advantage for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 and 256-bit on the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 72 MB (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
VRAM Capacity	12 GB	16 GB+33%
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	504 GB/s	576 GB/s+14%
Bus Width	192-bit	256-bit+33%
L2 Cache	36 MB	72 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.2 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC (2x)	8th Gen NVENC (2x)
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU's 175W — a 13.3% difference. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 650W (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 267mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
TDP	200W	175W-13%
Recommended PSU	650W	650W
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	304mm	267mm
Height	137mm	111mm
Slots	3	2-33%
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	134.6+16%	116.1