
GeForce RTX 4070

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
GeForce RTX 4070 vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4070 vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4070 vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅+15.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 304), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌73.9% higher power demand at 200W vs 115W.
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅16.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅65.2% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (304 vs 184).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 200W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (23,379 vs 26,919).
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4070 vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1425 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 9728 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 76 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,379 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile's 23,379 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 15.1%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 9,728 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 41.15 TFLOPS (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1575 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 76 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) with 184 Tensor cores vs 304.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+15% | 23,379 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888 | 9728+65% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS | 41.15 TFLOPS+41% |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+57% | 1575 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 112+75% |
| TMUs | 184 | 304+65% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB | 9.5 MB+64% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB | 64 MB+78% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 76+65% |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 304+65% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support Frame Generation, but the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is on the newer stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation, while the GeForce RTX 4070 stays on DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation+14% |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 4)+14% |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile carries 16 GB. RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 576 GB/s (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) — a 14.3% advantage for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 and 256-bit on the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 64 MB (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | 576 GB/s+14% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB | 64 MB+78% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs NVENC 8th gen (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile's 115W — a 54% difference. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 175W (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 115W-43% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 175W-73% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 304mm | — |
| Height | 137mm | — |
| Slots | 3 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6 | 203.3+51% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













