GeForce RTX 4070
RTX A1000
GeForce RTX 4070 vs RTX A1000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4070 vs RTX A1000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4070 vs RTX A1000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅109.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 211.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 14.4 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌300% higher power demand at 200W vs 50W.
- ❌86.5% longer card at 304mm vs 163mm.
RTX A1000
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 200W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅Measures 163mm instead of 304mm, a 141mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌25% HIGHER MSRP$749 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4070 vs RTX A1000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
RTX A1000
The RTX A1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1462 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,814 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the RTX A1000's 10,814 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 148.9%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A1000 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2,304 (RTX A1000). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 6.737 TFLOPS (RTX A1000). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1462 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 18 (RTX A1000) with 184 Tensor cores vs 72.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+149% | 10,814 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+156% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+333% | 6.737 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+69% | 1462 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 184+156% | 72 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+152% | 2.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+1700% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+156% | 18 |
| Tensor Cores | 184+156% | 72 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The RTX A1000 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX A1000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A1000 carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 and 128-bit on the RTX A1000. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2 MB (RTX A1000) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+1700% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.2 (RTX A1000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A1000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A1000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the RTX A1000's 50W — a 120% difference. The RTX A1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 500W (RTX A1000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 163mm, occupying 3 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 50W-75% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 163mm |
| Height | 137mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 3 | 1-67% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6 | 216.3+61% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 came in at $599, while the RTX A1000 launched at $749. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4070 was 20% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 14.4 (RTX A1000) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 211.8% better value. The newer card here is RTX A1000 (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-20% | $749 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+212% | 14.4 |
| Codename | AD104 | GA107 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | April 16 2024 |
| Ranking | #32 | #251 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4070 and RTX A1000
