G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs RTX A2000 12GB FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs RTX A2000 12GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅74.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 47.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 30.6 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌185.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 70W.
❌82% longer card at 304mm vs 167mm.

RTX A2000 12GB

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Draws 70W instead of 200W, a 130W reduction.
✅Measures 167mm instead of 304mm, a 137mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 30.6 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 74.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 96.2% in PassMark G3D (26,919 vs 13,721), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 12 GB vs 8 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while RTX A2000 12GB is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 8nm, and 46 vs 26 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4070 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $150 more expensive on MSRP at $599 vs $449, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 47.1% (44.9 vs 30.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs RTX A2000 12GB Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX A2000 12GB

The RTX A2000 12GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,721 points. Launch price was $449.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the RTX A2000 12GB's 13,721 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 96.2%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A2000 12GB uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 3,328 (RTX A2000 12GB). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 12GB). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1200 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 26 (RTX A2000 12GB) with 184 Tensor cores vs 104.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	RTX A2000 12GB
G3D Mark Score	26,919+96%	13,721
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Ampere
Process Node	5 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	5888+77%	3328
Compute (TFLOPS)	29.15 TFLOPS+265%	7.987 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2475 MHz+106%	1200 MHz
ROPs	64+33%	48
TMUs	184+77%	104
L1 Cache	5.8 MB+76%	3.3 MB
L2 Cache	36 MB+1100%	3 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	46+77%	26
Tensor Cores	184+77%	104

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The RTX A2000 12GB does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX A2000 12GB supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	RTX A2000 12GB
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A2000 12GB carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 and 128-bit on the RTX A2000 12GB. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 3 MB (RTX A2000 12GB) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	RTX A2000 12GB
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+50%	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Bus Width	192-bit+50%	128-bit
L2 Cache	36 MB+1100%	3 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000 12GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	RTX A2000 12GB
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 12GB). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 12GB).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	RTX A2000 12GB
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC (2x)	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the RTX A2000 12GB's 70W — a 96.3% difference. The RTX A2000 12GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 500W (RTX A2000 12GB). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 167mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	RTX A2000 12GB
TDP	200W	70W-65%
Recommended PSU	650W	500W-23%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	304mm	167mm
Height	137mm	68mm
Slots	3	2-33%
Temp (Load)	80°C	75°C-6%
Perf/Watt	134.6	196.0+46%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 came in at $599, while the RTX A2000 12GB launched at $449. On MSRP, RTX A2000 12GB was 25% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 30.6 (RTX A2000 12GB) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 46.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2021).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	RTX A2000 12GB
MSRP	$599	$449-25%
Performance per Dollar	44.9+47%	30.6
Codename	AD104	GA106
Release	April 12 2023	November 23 2021
Ranking	#32	#177

Search GeForce RTX 4070 on Amazon

Search RTX A2000 12GB on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.