
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

RTX A4500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅76.9% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,100 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 262% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 12.4 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 224), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.
RTX A4500
2021Why buy it
- ✅21.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (224 vs 184).
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌183.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,699 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
GeForce RTX 4070
2023RTX A4500
2021Why buy it
- ✅76.9% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,100 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 262% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 12.4 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅21.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (224 vs 184).
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 224), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌183.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,699 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than RTX A4500?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX A4500 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 299 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 260 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 332 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 96 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 564 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 477 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 407 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 372 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 260 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 149 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 75 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 39 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and RTX A4500

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX A4500
RTX A4500
The RTX A4500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1050 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 7168 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,094 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the RTX A4500's 21,094 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 27.6%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A4500 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 7,168 (RTX A4500). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 23.65 TFLOPS (RTX A4500). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1650 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 56 (RTX A4500) with 184 Tensor cores vs 224.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+28% | 21,094 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888 | 7168+22% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+23% | 23.65 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+50% | 1650 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 184 | 224+22% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB | 7 MB+21% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+500% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 56+22% |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 224+22% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A4500 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX A4500 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4500 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4500) — a 12.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 6 MB (RTX A4500) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+500% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s+13% | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+500% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.1 (RTX A4500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A4500). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4500).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the RTX A4500's 200W — a 0% difference. The RTX A4500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 450W (RTX A4500). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 304mm vs 267mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 450W-31% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 304mm | 267mm |
| Height | 137mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+28% | 105.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the RTX A4500 launched at $1699. The GeForce RTX 4070 costs 64.7% less ($1100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.4 (RTX A4500) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 262.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-65% | $1699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+262% | 12.4 |
| Codename | AD104 | GA102 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | November 23 2021 |
| Ranking | #32 | #68 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












