
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅17.3% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,400 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 199.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (26,919 vs 30,020).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 280), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌185.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 70W.
- ❌82% longer card at 304mm vs 167mm.
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
2025Why buy it
- ✅+11.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅52.2% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (280 vs 184).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 200W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 304mm, a 137mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌233.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
2025Why buy it
- ✅17.3% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,400 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 199.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
Why buy it
- ✅+11.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅52.2% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (280 vs 184).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 200W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 304mm, a 137mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (26,919 vs 30,020).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 280), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌185.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 70W.
- ❌82% longer card at 304mm vs 167mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌233.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition make more sense than GeForce RTX 4070?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 75 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 288 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 70 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 777 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 644 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 549 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 481 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 571 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 401 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 341 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 407 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 336 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 274 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 217 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 80 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 11 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 577 MHz to 1432 MHz. It has 8960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,020 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition's 30,020 — the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition leads by 11.5%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 8,960 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 25.66 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1432 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 70 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) with 184 Tensor cores vs 280.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919 | 30,020+12% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888 | 8960+52% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+14% | 25.66 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+73% | 1432 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 184 | 280+52% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB | 8.8 MB+52% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB | 48 MB+33% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 70+52% |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 280+52% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition has 24 GB. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 48 MB (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) — the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 24 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB | 48 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs NVENC 9th Gen (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 6th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | NVENC 9th Gen |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 6th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition's 70W — a 96.3% difference. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 650W (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 167mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 72°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 70W-65% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 167mm |
| Height | 137mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 72°C-10% |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6 | 428.9+219% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition launched at $1999. The GeForce RTX 4070 costs 70% less ($1400 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 15.0 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 199.3% better value. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-70% | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+199% | 15.0 |
| Codename | AD104 | GB203 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | August 11 2025 |
| Ranking | #32 | #17 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












