
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅108.8% more average FPS across 12 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌471.4% higher power demand at 200W vs 35W.
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 200W, a 165W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 12 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
2025Why buy it
- ✅108.8% more average FPS across 12 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 200W, a 165W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌471.4% higher power demand at 200W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 12 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile make more sense than GeForce RTX 4070?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 9 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 434 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 117 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 554 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 463 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 423 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 343 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 260 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 132 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 19 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 14 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,209 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile's 13,209 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 103.8%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1,792 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 9.032 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 2520 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 14 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) with 184 Tensor cores vs 56.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+104% | 13,209 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+229% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+223% | 9.032 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz | 2520 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 64+167% | 24 |
| TMUs | 184+229% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+222% | 1.8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+50% | 24 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+229% | 14 |
| Tensor Cores | 184+229% | 56 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 24 MB (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+50% | 24 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.0 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | 9th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile's 35W — a 140.4% difference. The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 500W (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 0mm, occupying 3 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 35W-83% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 0mm |
| Height | 137mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 3 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6 | 377.4+180% |
Value Analysis
The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | — |
| Codename | AD104 | GB207 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | March 19 2025 |
| Ranking | #32 | #244 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












