GeForce RTX 4070
T1000
GeForce RTX 4070 vs T1000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4070 vs T1000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce RTX 4070 vs T1000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅+251.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 105.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌300% higher power demand at 200W vs 50W.
- ❌94.9% longer card at 304mm vs 156mm.
T1000
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $249 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 200W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅Measures 156mm instead of 304mm, a 148mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,649 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4070 vs T1000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
T1000
The T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1395 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,649 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the T1000's 7,649 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 251.9%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the T1000 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 896 (T1000). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2.5 TFLOPS (T1000). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1395 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+252% | 7,649 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+557% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+1066% | 2.5 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+77% | 1395 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 184+229% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+559% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+3500% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The T1000 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The T1000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the T1000 carries 4 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 and 128-bit on the T1000. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1 MB (T1000) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+200% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+3500% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.1 (T1000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs NVENC 7.0 (T1000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (T1000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the T1000's 50W — a 120% difference. The T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (T1000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 156mm, occupying 3 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 50W-75% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 156mm |
| Height | 137mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 3 | 1-67% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6 | 153.0+14% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 came in at $599, while the T1000 launched at $350. On MSRP, T1000 was 41.6% cheaper ($249 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 21.9 (T1000) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 105% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $350-42% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+105% | 21.9 |
| Codename | AD104 | TU117 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #32 | #333 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4070 and T1000
