
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

T400 4GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅+607.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 87.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 23.9 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌566.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 30W.
- ❌94.9% longer card at 304mm vs 156mm.
T400 4GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $440 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 200W, a 170W reduction.
- ✅Measures 156mm instead of 304mm, a 148mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,803 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.9 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023T400 4GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅+607.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 87.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 23.9 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $440 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 200W, a 170W reduction.
- ✅Measures 156mm instead of 304mm, a 148mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌566.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 30W.
- ❌94.9% longer card at 304mm vs 156mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,803 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.9 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than T400 4GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is T400 4GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 8 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 21 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 8 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 2 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 48 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 14 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 43 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 30 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and T400 4GB

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
T400 4GB
T400 4GB
The T400 4GB is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the T400 4GB's 3,803 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 607.8%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the T400 4GB uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 384 (T400 4GB). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (T400 4GB). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1425 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+608% | 3,803 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+1433% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+2565% | 1.094 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+74% | 1425 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 184+667% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+1426% | 0.38 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+3500% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The T400 4GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The T400 4GB relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the T400 4GB has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1 MB (T400 4GB) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+500% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+3500% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12_0 (T400 4GB). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs NVENC 7th Gen (T400 4GB). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 4th Gen.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 4th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the T400 4GB's 30W — a 147.8% difference. The T400 4GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (T400 4GB). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 156mm, occupying 3 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 30W-85% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 156mm |
| Height | 137mm | — |
| Slots | 3 | 1-67% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+6% | 126.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the T400 4GB launched at $159. The T400 4GB costs 73.5% less ($440 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 23.9 (T400 4GB) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 87.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $159-73% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+88% | 23.9 |
| Codename | AD104 | TU117 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #32 | #518 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













