
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

Tesla K20m
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅+507.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,600 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $3,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 3143.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $3,199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Tesla K20m
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,432 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌434.1% HIGHER MSRP$3,199 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Tesla K20m
2013Why buy it
- ✅+507.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,600 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $3,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 3143.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $3,199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,432 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌434.1% HIGHER MSRP$3,199 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than Tesla K20m?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla K20m still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 17 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 18 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 7 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 50 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 31 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Tesla K20m

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Tesla K20m
Tesla K20m
The Tesla K20m is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 2496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,432 points. Launch price was $3,199.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Tesla K20m's 4,432 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 507.4%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Tesla K20m uses Kepler, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2,496 (Tesla K20m). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 3.524 TFLOPS (Tesla K20m).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+507% | 4,432 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Kepler |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+136% | 2496 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+727% | 3.524 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+60% | 40 |
| TMUs | 184 | 208+13% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+2800% | 0.2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+2780% | 1.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Tesla K20m lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla K20m relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla K20m has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1.25 MB (Tesla K20m) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+500% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+2780% | 1.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Tesla K20m's 225W — a 11.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (Tesla K20m). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-11% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | — |
| Height | 137mm | — |
| Slots | 3 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+583% | 19.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the Tesla K20m launched at $3199. The GeForce RTX 4070 costs 81.3% less ($2600 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1.4 (Tesla K20m) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 3107.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-81% | $3199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+3107% | 1.4 |
| Codename | AD104 | GK110 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | January 5 2013 |
| Ranking | #32 | #470 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












