GeForce RTX 4070 vs Tesla K20Xm

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070

2023Core: 1920 MHzBoost: 2475 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla K20Xm

2012Core: 732 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Tesla K20Xm Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Tesla K20Xm: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

  • +511.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Costs $7,100 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $7,699 MSRP).
  • Delivers 7758.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $7,699 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Tesla K20Xm

2012

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,403 vs 26,919).
  • Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 2012 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 1185.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $7,699 MSRPvs$599 MSRP

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 4070 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 511.4% in PassMark G3D (26,919 vs 4,403), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 12 GB vs 6 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while Tesla K20Xm is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, and 46 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4070 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $7,100 cheaper on MSRP at $599 vs $7,699, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 7758.1% (44.9 vs 0.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Tesla K20Xm Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

NVIDIA

Tesla K20Xm

The Tesla K20Xm is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 12 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 2688 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 235W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,403 points. Launch price was $7,699.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Tesla K20Xm's 4,403 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 511.4%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Tesla K20Xm uses Kepler, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2,688 (Tesla K20Xm). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 3.935 TFLOPS (Tesla K20Xm).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070Tesla K20Xm
G3D Mark Score
26,919+511%
4,403
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Kepler
Process Node
5 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
5888+119%
2688
Compute (TFLOPS)
29.15 TFLOPS+641%
3.935 TFLOPS
ROPs
64+33%
48
TMUs
184
224+22%
L1 Cache
5.8 MB+2536%
0.22 MB
L2 Cache
36 MB+2300%
1.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Tesla K20Xm does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Tesla K20Xm leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070Tesla K20Xm
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla K20Xm carries 6 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 and 64-bit on the Tesla K20Xm. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1.5 MB (Tesla K20Xm) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070Tesla K20Xm
VRAM Capacity
12 GB+100%
6 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6X
GDDR5
Bus Width
192-bit+200%
64-bit
L2 Cache
36 MB+2300%
1.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Tesla K20Xm's 235W — a 16.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (Tesla K20Xm). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070Tesla K20Xm
TDP
200W-15%
235W
Recommended PSU
650W
350W-46%
Power Connector
8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
304mm
Height
137mm
Slots
3
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
134.6+620%
18.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 came in at $599, while the Tesla K20Xm launched at $7699. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4070 was 92.2% cheaper ($7100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 0.6 (Tesla K20Xm) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 7383.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070Tesla K20Xm
MSRP
$599-92%
$7699
Performance per Dollar
44.9+7383%
0.6
Codename
AD104
GK110
Release
April 12 2023
November 12 2012
Ranking
#32
#473

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.