GeForce RTX 4070 vs Tesla K40c

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Tesla K40c FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Tesla K40c: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅+498.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $7,100 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $7,699 MSRP).
✅Delivers 7597.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $7,699 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.

Tesla K40c

2013

Why buy it

✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,495 vs 26,919).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1185.3% HIGHER MSRP
$7,699 MSRPvs$599 MSRP

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 498.9% in PassMark G3D (26,919 vs 4,495), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 12 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while Tesla K40c is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, and 46 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4070 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $7,100 cheaper on MSRP at $599 vs $7,699, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 7597.3% (44.9 vs 0.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Tesla K40c Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Tesla K40c

The Tesla K40c is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 745 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 245W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $7,699.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Tesla K40c's 4,495 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 498.9%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Tesla K40c uses Kepler, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2,880 (Tesla K40c). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 5.046 TFLOPS (Tesla K40c). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 876 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Tesla K40c
G3D Mark Score	26,919+499%	4,495
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Kepler
Process Node	5 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	5888+104%	2880
Compute (TFLOPS)	29.15 TFLOPS+478%	5.046 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2475 MHz+183%	876 MHz
ROPs	64+33%	48
TMUs	184	240+30%
L1 Cache	5.8 MB+2422%	0.23 MB
L2 Cache	36 MB+2300%	1.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Tesla K40c does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Tesla K40c leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Tesla K40c
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla K40c carries 2 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 and 64-bit on the Tesla K40c. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1.5 MB (Tesla K40c) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Tesla K40c
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+500%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR5
Bus Width	192-bit+200%	64-bit
L2 Cache	36 MB+2300%	1.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 11_0 (Tesla K40c). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Tesla K40c
DirectX	12.2+11%	11_0
Max Displays	4	0

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Tesla K40c's 245W — a 20.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (Tesla K40c). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 267mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Tesla K40c
TDP	200W-18%	245W
Recommended PSU	650W	350W-46%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	304mm	267mm
Height	137mm	—
Slots	3	2-33%
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	134.6+636%	18.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 came in at $599, while the Tesla K40c launched at $7699. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4070 was 92.2% cheaper ($7100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 0.6 (Tesla K40c) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 7383.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Tesla K40c
MSRP	$599-92%	$7699
Performance per Dollar	44.9+7383%	0.6
Codename	AD104	GK180
Release	April 12 2023	October 8 2013
Ranking	#32	#465

Search GeForce RTX 4070 on Amazon

Search Tesla K40c on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.