G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅+498.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $7,100 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $7,699 MSRP).
✅Delivers 7597.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $7,699 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.

Tesla K40c

2013

Why buy it

✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,495 vs 26,919).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
1185.3% HIGHER MSRP
$7,699 MSRPvs$599 MSRP

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Tesla K40c

2013

Why buy it

✅+498.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $7,100 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $7,699 MSRP).
✅Delivers 7597.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $7,699 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).

Why buy it

✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,495 vs 26,919).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
1185.3% HIGHER MSRP
$7,699 MSRPvs$599 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than Tesla K40c?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 26,919 vs 4,495 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Tesla K40c is a 2013 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2013, 498.9% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 2 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4070 is about $7,100 cheaper on MSRP at $599 MSRP versus $7,699 MSRP, and you are getting 498.9% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 7597.3%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Tesla K40c still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Tesla K40c is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $7,699 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4070 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Benchmark Check

Tesla K40c Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Tesla K40c
1080p
low	183 FPS	110 FPS
medium	167 FPS	94 FPS
high	151 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	131 FPS	44 FPS
1440p
low	150 FPS	88 FPS
medium	124 FPS	76 FPS
high	110 FPS	53 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	32 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	29 FPS
medium	78 FPS	27 FPS
high	65 FPS	18 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	15 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Tesla K40c

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Tesla K40c
1080p
low	544 FPS	120 FPS
medium	454 FPS	93 FPS
high	353 FPS	74 FPS
ultra	299 FPS	54 FPS
1440p
low	351 FPS	79 FPS
medium	288 FPS	55 FPS
high	235 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	30 FPS
4K
low	172 FPS	32 FPS
medium	144 FPS	24 FPS
high	125 FPS	22 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	17 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Tesla K40c

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Tesla K40c
1080p
low	884 FPS	202 FPS
medium	713 FPS	162 FPS
high	643 FPS	135 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	101 FPS
1440p
low	684 FPS	152 FPS
medium	549 FPS	121 FPS
high	483 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	424 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	467 FPS	101 FPS
medium	373 FPS	81 FPS
high	326 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	277 FPS	51 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Tesla K40c

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Tesla K40c
1080p
low	751 FPS	179 FPS
medium	612 FPS	143 FPS
high	536 FPS	124 FPS
ultra	497 FPS	94 FPS
1440p
low	615 FPS	124 FPS
medium	500 FPS	102 FPS
high	433 FPS	89 FPS
ultra	395 FPS	66 FPS
4K
low	384 FPS	73 FPS
medium	324 FPS	57 FPS
high	301 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	272 FPS	31 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Tesla K40c

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Tesla K40c

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Tesla K40c

The Tesla K40c is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 745 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 245W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $7,699.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Tesla K40c's 4,495 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 498.9%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Tesla K40c uses Kepler, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2,880 (Tesla K40c). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 5.046 TFLOPS (Tesla K40c). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 876 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Tesla K40c
G3D Mark Score	26,919+499%	4,495
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Kepler
Process Node	5 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	5888+104%	2880
Compute (TFLOPS)	29.15 TFLOPS+478%	5.046 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2475 MHz+183%	876 MHz
ROPs	64+33%	48
TMUs	184	240+30%
L1 Cache	5.8 MB+2422%	0.23 MB
L2 Cache	36 MB+2300%	1.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Tesla K40c lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla K40c relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Tesla K40c
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla K40c has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1.5 MB (Tesla K40c) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Tesla K40c
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+500%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR5
Bus Width	192-bit+200%	64-bit
L2 Cache	36 MB+2300%	1.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 11_0 (Tesla K40c). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Tesla K40c
DirectX	12.2+11%	11_0
Max Displays	4	0

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Tesla K40c's 245W — a 20.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (Tesla K40c). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 267mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Tesla K40c
TDP	200W-18%	245W
Recommended PSU	650W	350W-46%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	304mm	267mm
Height	137mm	—
Slots	3	2-33%
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	134.6+636%	18.3

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the Tesla K40c launched at $7699. The GeForce RTX 4070 costs 92.2% less ($7100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 0.6 (Tesla K40c) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 7383.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).