G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Tesla M2090 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Tesla M2090: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅+1822.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $1,901 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 7925% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅2300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌22.6% longer card at 304mm vs 248mm.

Tesla M2090

2011

Why buy it

✅Measures 248mm instead of 304mm, a 56mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,400 vs 26,919).
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
317.4% HIGHER MSRP
$2,500 MSRPvs$599 MSRP

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1822.8% in PassMark G3D (26,919 vs 1,400), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 12 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while Tesla M2090 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 40nm, and 46 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4070 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,901 cheaper on MSRP at $599 vs $2,500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 7925% (44.9 vs 0.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Tesla M2090 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Tesla M2090

The Tesla M2090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 651 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,400 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Tesla M2090's 1,400 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 1822.8%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Tesla M2090 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 512 (Tesla M2090). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1.332 TFLOPS (Tesla M2090).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Tesla M2090
G3D Mark Score	26,919+1823%	1,400
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	5 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	5888+1050%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	29.15 TFLOPS+2088%	1.332 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+33%	48
TMUs	184+188%	64
L1 Cache	5.8 MB+480%	1 MB
L2 Cache	36 MB+4700%	0.75 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Tesla M2090 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Tesla M2090 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Tesla M2090
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M2090 carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 2300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 and 64-bit on the Tesla M2090. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 0.75 MB (Tesla M2090) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Tesla M2090
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+2300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR5
Bus Width	192-bit+200%	64-bit
L2 Cache	36 MB+4700%	0.75 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12 (FL 11_0) (Tesla M2090). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Tesla M2090
DirectX	12.2+2%	12 (FL 11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs CUDA,OpenCL (Tesla M2090).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Tesla M2090
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC (2x)	—
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	—
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	CUDA,OpenCL

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Tesla M2090's 250W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (Tesla M2090). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 248mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Tesla M2090
TDP	200W-20%	250W
Recommended PSU	650W	350W-46%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	304mm	248mm
Height	137mm	111mm
Slots	3	2-33%
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	134.6+2304%	5.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 came in at $599, while the Tesla M2090 launched at $2500. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4070 was 76% cheaper ($1901 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 0.6 (Tesla M2090) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 7383.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Tesla M2090
MSRP	$599-76%	$2500
Performance per Dollar	44.9+7383%	0.6
Codename	AD104	GF110
Release	April 12 2023	July 25 2011
Ranking	#32	#530

Search GeForce RTX 4070 on Amazon

Search Tesla M2090 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.