
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅+694.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 32.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 33.9 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌566.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 30W.
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $499 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 200W, a 170W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,390 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 33.9 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
2020Why buy it
- ✅+694.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 32.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 33.9 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $499 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 200W, a 170W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌566.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 30W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,390 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 33.9 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 20 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 12 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 18 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 7 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 38 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 30 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,390 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7's 3,390 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 694.1%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 5 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 96 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+694% | 3,390 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+6033% | 96 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+500% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.1 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs QuickSync (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | QuickSync |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | QuickSync |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7's 30W — a 147.8% difference. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 0mm, occupying 3 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 30W-85% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 0mm |
| Height | 137mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 3 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+19% | 113.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 launched at $100. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 costs 83.3% less ($499 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 33.9 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 32.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $100-83% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+32% | 33.9 |
| Codename | AD104 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | April 12 2023 | August 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #32 | #508 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













