GeForce RTX 4070 vs Titan X Pascal

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070

2023Core: 1920 MHzBoost: 2475 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS

Titan X Pascal

2016Core: 1417 MHzBoost: 1531 MHz
Similar parts
···

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Titan X Pascal Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Titan X Pascal FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Titan X Pascal: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

  • 42.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $600 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
  • Delivers 294.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 11.4 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.

Titan X Pascal

2016

Why buy it

  • Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 100.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,199 MSRPvs$599 MSRP

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 4070 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 42.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 97.1% in PassMark G3D (26,919 vs 13,660), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 12 GB vs 8 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while Titan X Pascal is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 16nm, and 46 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4070 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $600 cheaper on MSRP at $599 vs $1,199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 294.5% (44.9 vs 11.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Titan X Pascal Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

NVIDIA

Titan X Pascal

The Titan X Pascal is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 2 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1417 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,660 points. Launch price was $1,199.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Titan X Pascal's 13,660 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 97.1%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Titan X Pascal uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 3,584 (Titan X Pascal). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 10.97 TFLOPS (Titan X Pascal). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1531 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070Titan X Pascal
G3D Mark Score
26,919+97%
13,660
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Pascal
Process Node
5 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
5888+64%
3584
Compute (TFLOPS)
29.15 TFLOPS+166%
10.97 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2475 MHz+62%
1531 MHz
ROPs
64
96+50%
TMUs
184
224+22%
L1 Cache
5.8 MB+346%
1.3 MB
L2 Cache
36 MB+1100%
3 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Titan X Pascal does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Titan X Pascal leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070Titan X Pascal
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Titan X Pascal carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 480 GB/s (Titan X Pascal) — a 5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 and 384-bit on the Titan X Pascal. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 3 MB (Titan X Pascal) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070Titan X Pascal
VRAM Capacity
12 GB+50%
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6X
GDDR5X
Memory Bandwidth
504 GB/s+5%
480 GB/s
Bus Width
192-bit
384-bit+100%
L2 Cache
36 MB+1100%
3 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.1 (Titan X Pascal). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070Titan X Pascal
DirectX
12.2
12.1
Vulkan
1.3+18%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Titan X Pascal). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Titan X Pascal).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070Titan X Pascal
Encoder
8th Gen NVENC (2x)
NVENC 5.0 (2x)
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
PureVideo HD VP8
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Titan X Pascal's 250W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 600W (Titan X Pascal). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 304mm vs 267mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070Titan X Pascal
TDP
200W-20%
250W
Recommended PSU
650W
600W-8%
Power Connector
8-pin
6-pin + 8-pin
Length
304mm
267mm
Height
137mm
112mm
Slots
3
2-33%
Temp (Load)
80°C-6%
85°C
Perf/Watt
134.6+147%
54.6
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 came in at $599, while the Titan X Pascal launched at $1199. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4070 was 50% cheaper ($600 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 11.4 (Titan X Pascal) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 293.9% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2016).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070Titan X Pascal
MSRP
$599-50%
$1199
Performance per Dollar
44.9+294%
11.4
Codename
AD104
GP102
Release
April 12 2023
August 2 2016
Ranking
#32
#198

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.