
GeForce RTX 4070

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
GeForce RTX 4070 vs UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4070 vs UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GeForce RTX 4070 vs UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅+3264.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌1233.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 15W.
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 200W, a 185W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (800 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2021 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4070 vs UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 16 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 800 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)'s 800 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 3264.9%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) uses Gen. 12, both on 5 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 16 (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1450 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+3265% | 800 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Gen. 12 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+36700% | 16 |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+71% | 1450 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) carries 0 MB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 and System on the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12 (12_1) (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs Quick Sync 8 (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs Quick Sync 8. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | Quick Sync 8 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | Quick Sync 8 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)'s 15W — a 172.1% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1W (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 15W-93% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 304mm | — |
| Height | 137mm | — |
| Slots | 3 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+153% | 53.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 came in at $599, while the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) launched at $0. On MSRP, UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) was 100+% cheaper ($599 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)) — the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9 | Infinity |
| Codename | AD104 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | April 12 2023 | March 30 2021 |
| Ranking | #32 | #917 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














