
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- β +1123.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs Unknown).
- β More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022β2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- β1233.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 15W.
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
2021Why buy it
- β Draws 15W instead of 200W, a 185W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (2,200 vs 26,919).
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2021-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
2021Why buy it
- β +1123.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs Unknown).
- β More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022β2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- β Draws 15W instead of 200W, a 185W reduction.
Trade-offs
- β1233.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (2,200 vs 26,919).
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2021-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 12 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 18 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 10 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 25 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 25 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 32 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,200 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs's 2,200 β the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 1123.6%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs uses Gen. 12, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 32 (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1450 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+1124% | 2,200 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Gen. 12 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+18300% | 32 |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+71% | 1450 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs's 15W β a 172.1% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1W (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 15W-93% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 304mm | β |
| Height | 137mm | β |
| Slots | 3 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 80Β°C | β |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6 | 146.7+9% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs launched at $0. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs costs 100+% less ($599 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs) β the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9 | Infinity |
| Codename | AD104 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | April 12 2023 | March 30 2021 |
| Ranking | #32 | #744 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












