
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Radeon PRO W7700
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile vs Radeon PRO W7700 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile vs Radeon PRO W7700 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile vs Radeon PRO W7700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅5.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 190W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌13.1% HIGHER MSRP$1,130 MSRPvs$999 MSRP
Radeon PRO W7700
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $131 less on MSRP ($999 MSRP vs $1,130 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌26.7% higher power demand at 190W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile vs Radeon PRO W7700 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 2010 MHz. It has 7424 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 58 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,805 points.

Radeon PRO W7700
The Radeon PRO W7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,062 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile scores 24,805 versus the Radeon PRO W7700's 23,062 — the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile leads by 7.6%. The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W7700 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 7,424 (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 3,072 (Radeon PRO W7700). Raw compute: 24.72 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 31.95 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7700). Boost clocks: 2010 MHz vs 2600 MHz. Ray tracing: 58 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 48 (Radeon PRO W7700) with 232 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 24,805+8% | 23,062 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 7424+142% | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 24.72 TFLOPS | 31.95 TFLOPS+29% |
| Boost Clock | 2010 MHz | 2600 MHz+29% |
| ROPs | 80 | 96+20% |
| TMUs | 232+21% | 192 |
| L1 Cache | 7.3 MB+873% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+2300% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 58+21% | 48 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon PRO W7700 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W7700 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7700 carries 16 GB. Radeon PRO W7700 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile and 192-bit on the Radeon PRO W7700. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7700) — the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s | 432 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+2300% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7700). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7700).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile draws 150W versus the Radeon PRO W7700's 190W — a 23.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 550W (Radeon PRO W7700). Power connectors: Mobile vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-21% | 190W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 550W-15% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 165.4+36% | 121.4 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile came in at $1130, while the Radeon PRO W7700 launched at $999. On MSRP, Radeon PRO W7700 was 11.6% cheaper ($131 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 22.0 (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 23.1 (Radeon PRO W7700) — the Radeon PRO W7700 offers 5% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1130 | $999-12% |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.0 | 23.1+5% |
| Codename | AD104 | Navi 32 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | November 13 2023 |
| Ranking | #43 | #52 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














