GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile vs Radeon PRO W7700
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
Popular choices:
Radeon PRO W7700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 7.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon PRO W7700 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+7.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-7.6%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile and Radeon PRO W7700
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 2010 MHz. It has 7424 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 58 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,805 points.
Radeon PRO W7700
The Radeon PRO W7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,062 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile scores 24,805 versus the Radeon PRO W7700's 23,062 — the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile leads by 7.6%. The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W7700 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 7,424 (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 3,072 (Radeon PRO W7700). Raw compute: 24.72 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 31.95 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7700). Boost clocks: 2010 MHz vs 2600 MHz. Ray tracing: 58 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 48 (Radeon PRO W7700) with 232 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 24,805+8% | 23,062 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 7424+142% | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 24.72 TFLOPS | 31.95 TFLOPS+29% |
| Boost Clock | 2010 MHz | 2600 MHz+29% |
| ROPs | 80 | 96+20% |
| TMUs | 232+21% | 192 |
| L1 Cache | 7.3 MB+873% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+2300% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 58+21% | 48 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7700 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7700 has 16 GB. The Radeon PRO W7700 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7700) — the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s | 432 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+2300% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7700). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7700).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile draws 150W versus the Radeon PRO W7700's 190W — a 23.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 550W (Radeon PRO W7700). Power connectors: Mobile vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-21% | 190W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 550W-15% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 165.4+36% | 121.4 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile and Radeon PRO W7700
