GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
Popular choices:
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
Performance Per Dollar RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+6.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile and RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 2010 MHz. It has 7424 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 58 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,805 points.
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1425 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 9728 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 76 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,379 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile scores 24,805 versus the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile's 23,379 — the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile leads by 6.1%. The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 7,424 (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 9,728 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 24.72 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 41.15 TFLOPS (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 2010 MHz vs 1575 MHz. Ray tracing: 58 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 76 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) with 232 Tensor cores vs 304.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 24,805+6% | 23,379 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 7424 | 9728+31% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 24.72 TFLOPS | 41.15 TFLOPS+66% |
| Boost Clock | 2010 MHz+28% | 1575 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 112+40% |
| TMUs | 232 | 304+31% |
| L1 Cache | 7.3 MB | 9.5 MB+30% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 64 MB+33% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 58 | 76+31% |
| Tensor Cores | 232 | 304+31% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile has 16 GB. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 576 GB/s (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) — a 33.3% advantage for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 64 MB (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s | 576 GB/s+33% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 64 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs NVENC 8th gen (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile draws 150W versus the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile's 115W — a 26.4% difference. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 175W (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: Mobile vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 115W-23% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 175W-73% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 165.4 | 203.3+23% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile and RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
