G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

2023

Why buy it

✅38.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $869 less on MSRP ($1,130 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 82.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.0 vs 12.0 G3D/$ ($1,130 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅20.8% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (232 vs 192).
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌114.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 70W.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 70W instead of 150W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (192 vs 232), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
❌
76.9% HIGHER MSRP
$1,999 MSRPvs$1,130 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 22.0 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $1,130 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 38.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.2% in PassMark G3D (24,805 vs 24,046), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 12 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 4nm process instead of 5nm, and 58 vs 48 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile makes the most sense to buy today. It is $869 cheaper on MSRP at $1,130 vs $1,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 82.5% (22.0 vs 12.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 2010 MHz. It has 7424 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 58 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,805 points.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,046 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile scores 24,805 and the RTX 4000 Ada Generation reaches 24,046 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 7,424 (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 24.72 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 26.73 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2010 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 58 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 48 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) with 232 Tensor cores vs 192.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile	RTX 4000 Ada Generation
G3D Mark Score	24,805+3%	24,046
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	4 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	7424+21%	6144
Compute (TFLOPS)	24.72 TFLOPS	26.73 TFLOPS+8%
Boost Clock	2010 MHz+29%	1560 MHz
ROPs	80+25%	64
TMUs	232+21%	192
L1 Cache	7.3 MB+22%	6 MB
L2 Cache	48 MB	48 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	58+21%	48
Tensor Cores	232+21%	192

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both cards support Frame Generation in supported games, so this part of the feature set is broadly comparable.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile	RTX 4000 Ada Generation
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile has 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation carries 2 GB. GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 360 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — a 20% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile and 160-bit on the RTX 4000 Ada Generation.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile	RTX 4000 Ada Generation
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+500%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6 ECC
Memory Bandwidth	432 GB/s+20%	360 GB/s
Bus Width	192-bit+20%	160-bit
L2 Cache	48 MB	48 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile	RTX 4000 Ada Generation
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	1	4+300%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 8th Gen NVENC (3x) (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile	RTX 4000 Ada Generation
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	8th Gen NVENC (3x)
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile draws 150W versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 70W — a 72.7% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 750W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: Mobile vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile	RTX 4000 Ada Generation
TDP	150W	70W-53%
Recommended PSU	650W-13%	750W
Power Connector	Mobile	1x 8-pin
Length	0mm	267mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	165.4	343.5+108%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile came in at $1130, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation launched at $1999. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile was 43.5% cheaper ($869 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 22.0 (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 12.0 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile offers 83.3% better value.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile	RTX 4000 Ada Generation
MSRP	$1130-43%	$1999
Performance per Dollar	22.0+83%	12.0
Codename	AD104	AD104
Release	January 3 2023	August 9 2023
Ranking	#43	#47

Search GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile on Amazon

Search RTX 4000 Ada Generation on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.