GeForce RTX 5050 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 5050
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 5050
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 32.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 5050.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 5050 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-32.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+32.6%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 5050 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $249 versus $380 for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti, it costs 34% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 15.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 5050 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+15.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($249) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($380) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 5050 and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 5050
The GeForce RTX 5050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 24 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2317 MHz to 2572 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,087 points. Launch price was $249.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 5050 scores 17,087 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 22,651 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 32.6%. The GeForce RTX 5050 is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 5050) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Raw compute: 13.17 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5050) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Boost clocks: 2572 MHz vs 2535 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 5050) vs 34 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) with 80 Tensor cores vs 136.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5050 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,087 | 22,651+33% |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 4352+70% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 13.17 TFLOPS | 22.06 TFLOPS+68% |
| Boost Clock | 2572 MHz+1% | 2535 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 80 | 136+70% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 4.3 MB+72% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB | 32 MB+33% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 34+70% |
| Tensor Cores | 80 | 136+70% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 5050 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5050 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 320 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5050) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — a 11.1% advantage for the GeForce RTX 5050. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 5050) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5050 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 320 GB/s+11% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB | 32 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 5050) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5050 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 9th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 5050) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Decoder: 6th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 5050) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5050 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 9th Gen NVENC | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 6th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 5050 draws 130W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 160W — a 20.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 5050 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 5050) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5050 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-19% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-18% | 550W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 131.4 | 141.6+8% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 5050 launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $249, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 and now averages $380. The GeForce RTX 5050 costs 34.5% less ($131 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 68.6 (GeForce RTX 5050) vs 59.6 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 5050 offers 15.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 5050 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5050 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-38% | $399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $249-34% | $380 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.6+15% | 59.6 |
| Codename | GB207 | AD106 |
| Release | June 24 2025 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #112 | #59 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 5050 and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
