GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB vs GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 18.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-18.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+18.2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (304mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $429 versus $550 for the GeForce RTX 4070, it costs 22% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 8.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+8.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($429) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($550) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB and GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2407 MHz to 2572 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,770 points. Launch price was $429.
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB scores 22,770 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 18.2%. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,608 (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 23.7 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 2572 MHz vs 2475 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs 46 (GeForce RTX 4070) with 144 Tensor cores vs 184.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,770 | 26,919+18% |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608 | 5888+28% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 23.7 TFLOPS | 29.15 TFLOPS+23% |
| Boost Clock | 2572 MHz+4% | 2475 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 144 | 184+28% |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB | 5.8 MB+29% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB | 36 MB+13% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36 | 46+28% |
| Tensor Cores | 144 | 184+28% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) — a 12.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+33% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 504 GB/s+13% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB | 36 MB+13% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (9th Gen) (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: NVDEC (6th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (9th Gen) | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (6th Gen) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB draws 180W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 10.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 68°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-10% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 304mm |
| Height | — | 137mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 68°C-15% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 126.5 | 134.6+6% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB launched at $429 MSRP and currently averages $429, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 and now averages $550. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB costs 22% less ($121 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 53.1 (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs 48.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB offers 8.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $429-28% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $429-22% | $550 |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.1+9% | 48.9 |
| Codename | GB206 | AD104 |
| Release | April 16 2025 | April 12 2023 |
| Ranking | #55 | #32 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB and GeForce RTX 4070
