GeForce RTX 5080 vs GeForce RTX 4090
GeForce RTX 5080
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4090
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 5080
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4090
Why is GeForce RTX 4090 better than GeForce RTX 5080?
The GeForce RTX 4090 and RTX 5080 represent different performance tiers, with the RTX 4090 being approximately 25-30% faster despite being the older card. The RTX 4090's 16384 CUDA cores and 24GB GDDR6X at 1008 GB/s bandwidth outmuscle the RTX 5080's 10752 cores and 16GB GDDR7 at 960 GB/s.
However, the RTX 5080 at $999 offers better value per dollar with new Blackwell architecture features including DLSS 4 Multi-Frame Generation, which can dramatically boost performance in supported titles. The 5080's 360W TDP is also more manageable than the 4090's 450W.
For maximum raw performance regardless of cost, the RTX 4090 remains king for 4K gaming and content creation. The RTX 5080 makes more sense for those prioritizing value and the latest features over absolute performance, effectively offering RTX 4080 SUPER+ performance at a reasonable price point.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4090 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.1% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (24 GB vs 16 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 5080.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 5080 | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+6.1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (304mm) | Standard Size (304mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 5080 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $1,250 versus $1,649 for the GeForce RTX 4090, it costs 24% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 24.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 5080 | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+24.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($1,250) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,649) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 5080 and GeForce RTX 4090
GeForce RTX 5080
The GeForce RTX 5080 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2295 MHz to 2617 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 360W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35,924 points. Launch price was $999.
GeForce RTX 4090
The GeForce RTX 4090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 16384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 128 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 38,112 points. Launch price was $1,599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 5080 scores 35,924 versus the GeForce RTX 4090's 38,112 — the GeForce RTX 4090 leads by 6.1%. The GeForce RTX 5080 is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 4090 uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 10,752 (GeForce RTX 5080) vs 16,384 (GeForce RTX 4090). Raw compute: 56.28 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5080) vs 82.58 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4090). Boost clocks: 2617 MHz vs 2520 MHz. Ray tracing: 84 RT cores (GeForce RTX 5080) vs 128 (GeForce RTX 4090) with 336 Tensor cores vs 512.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5080 | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 35,924 | 38,112+6% |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 10752 | 16384+52% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 56.28 TFLOPS | 82.58 TFLOPS+47% |
| Boost Clock | 2617 MHz+4% | 2520 MHz |
| ROPs | 112 | 176+57% |
| TMUs | 336 | 512+52% |
| L1 Cache | 10.5 MB | 16 MB+52% |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB | 72 MB+13% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 84 | 128+52% |
| Tensor Cores | 336 | 512+52% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4090 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 5080 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5080 | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 5080 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4090 has 24 GB. The GeForce RTX 4090 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 1024 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5080) vs 1008 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4090) — a 1.6% advantage for the GeForce RTX 5080. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 64 MB (GeForce RTX 5080) vs 72 MB (GeForce RTX 4090) — the GeForce RTX 4090 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5080 | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 24 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1024 GB/s+2% | 1008 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB | 72 MB+13% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 5080) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4090). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5080 | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 9th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 5080) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4090). Decoder: 6th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 5080) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4090).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5080 | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 9th Gen NVENC (2x) | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | 6th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 5080 draws 360W versus the GeForce RTX 4090's 450W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 5080 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 850W (GeForce RTX 5080) vs 1000W (GeForce RTX 4090). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 304mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5080 | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 360W-20% | 450W |
| Recommended PSU | 850W-15% | 1000W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin (12VHPWR) | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 304mm | 304mm |
| Height | 137mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 99.8+18% | 84.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 5080 launched at $999 MSRP and currently averages $1250, while the GeForce RTX 4090 launched at $1599 and now averages $1649. The GeForce RTX 5080 costs 24.2% less ($399 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 28.7 (GeForce RTX 5080) vs 23.1 (GeForce RTX 4090) — the GeForce RTX 5080 offers 24.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 5080 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5080 | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999-38% | $1599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1250-24% | $1649 |
| Performance per Dollar | 28.7+24% | 23.1 |
| Codename | GB203 | AD102 |
| Release | January 30 2025 | September 20 2022 |
| Ranking | #5 | #4 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 5080 and GeForce RTX 4090
