GeForce RTX 5080 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
GeForce RTX 5080
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 5080
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 5080 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 12.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 5080 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+12.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-12.9%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (304mm) | Standard Size (310mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $800 versus $1,250 for the GeForce RTX 5080, it costs 36% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 38.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 5080 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+38.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,250) | ✅More affordable ($800) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 5080 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
GeForce RTX 5080
The GeForce RTX 5080 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2295 MHz to 2617 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 360W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35,924 points. Launch price was $999.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2340 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 8448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 66 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,828 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 5080 scores 35,924 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 31,828 — the GeForce RTX 5080 leads by 12.9%. The GeForce RTX 5080 is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 10,752 (GeForce RTX 5080) vs 8,448 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Raw compute: 56.28 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5080) vs 44.1 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Boost clocks: 2617 MHz vs 2610 MHz. Ray tracing: 84 RT cores (GeForce RTX 5080) vs 66 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) with 336 Tensor cores vs 264.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5080 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 35,924+13% | 31,828 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 10752+27% | 8448 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 56.28 TFLOPS+28% | 44.1 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2617 MHz | 2610 MHz |
| ROPs | 112+17% | 96 |
| TMUs | 336+27% | 264 |
| L1 Cache | 10.5 MB+27% | 8.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB+33% | 48 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 84+27% | 66 |
| Tensor Cores | 336+27% | 264 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 5080 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5080 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 16 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 1024 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5080) vs 672 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) — a 52.4% advantage for the GeForce RTX 5080. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 64 MB (GeForce RTX 5080) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) — the GeForce RTX 5080 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5080 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1024 GB/s+52% | 672 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB+33% | 48 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 5080) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5080 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 9th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 5080) vs NVENC 8th gen (Dual) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Decoder: 6th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 5080) vs AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5080 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 9th Gen NVENC (2x) | NVENC 8th gen (Dual) |
| Decoder | 6th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 5080 draws 360W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 285W — a 23.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 850W (GeForce RTX 5080) vs 750W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 304mm vs 310mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 72°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5080 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 360W | 285W-21% |
| Recommended PSU | 850W | 750W-12% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin (12VHPWR) | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 304mm | 310mm |
| Height | 137mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 72°C-10% |
| Perf/Watt | 99.8 | 111.7+12% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 5080 launched at $999 MSRP and currently averages $1250, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER launched at $799 and now averages $800. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER costs 36% less ($450 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 28.7 (GeForce RTX 5080) vs 39.8 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER offers 38.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 5080 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2024).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5080 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $799-20% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1250 | $800-36% |
| Performance per Dollar | 28.7 | 39.8+39% |
| Codename | GB203 | AD103 |
| Release | January 30 2025 | January 8 2024 |
| Ranking | #5 | #10 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 5080 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
