GeForce4 Ti 4600 vs GeForce FX 5200SE
GeForce4 Ti 4600
Popular choices:
GeForce FX 5200SE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce4 Ti 4600 is positioned at rank 384 and the GeForce FX 5200SE is on rank 373, so the GeForce FX 5200SE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce4 Ti 4600
Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX 5200SE
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce FX 5200SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 100% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (512 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce4 Ti 4600.
| Insight | GeForce4 Ti 4600 | GeForce FX 5200SE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-100%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+100%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce FX 5200SE offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce FX 5200SE holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $40), it costs 75% less, resulting in a 700% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce4 Ti 4600 | GeForce FX 5200SE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+700%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce4 Ti 4600 and GeForce FX 5200SE
GeForce4 Ti 4600
The GeForce4 Ti 4600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 12 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $229.
GeForce FX 5200SE
The GeForce FX 5200SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2012. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 736 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12 points. Launch price was $89.99.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 Ti 4600 scores 6 versus the GeForce FX 5200SE's 12 — the GeForce FX 5200SE leads by 100%. The GeForce4 Ti 4600 is built on Fermi while the GeForce FX 5200SE uses Rankine, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 336 (GeForce4 Ti 4600) vs 288 (GeForce FX 5200SE). Raw compute: 0.9072 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4600) vs 0.8479 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5200SE).
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4600 | GeForce FX 5200SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6 | 12+100% |
| Architecture | Fermi | Rankine |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 336+17% | 288 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9072 TFLOPS+7% | 0.8479 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+33% | 24 |
| TMUs | 56+17% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB+17% | 384 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4600 | GeForce FX 5200SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce4 Ti 4600 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce FX 5200SE has 512 MB. The GeForce FX 5200SE offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce4 Ti 4600) vs 384 KB (GeForce FX 5200SE) — the GeForce4 Ti 4600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4600 | GeForce FX 5200SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4600) vs 9.0a (GeForce FX 5200SE). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 1.3 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4600 | GeForce FX 5200SE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 8.1 | 9.0a+11% |
| Vulkan | None | N/A |
| OpenGL | 1.3 | 1.5+15% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce4 Ti 4600) vs None (GeForce FX 5200SE). Decoder: No vs None.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4600 | GeForce FX 5200SE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | None |
| Decoder | No | None |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce4 Ti 4600 draws 160W versus the GeForce FX 5200SE's 150W — a 6.5% difference. The GeForce FX 5200SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4600) vs 350W (GeForce FX 5200SE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 216mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 70.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4600 | GeForce FX 5200SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 150W-6% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 216mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | 100mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-7% | 70 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce4 Ti 4600 launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the GeForce FX 5200SE launched at $99 and now averages $10. The GeForce FX 5200SE costs 75% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4600) vs 1.2 (GeForce FX 5200SE) — the GeForce FX 5200SE offers 1100% better value. The GeForce FX 5200SE is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4600 | GeForce FX 5200SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $99-75% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $10-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.1 | 1.2+1100% |
| Codename | GF104 | GF114 |
| Release | July 12 2010 | February 20 2012 |
| Ranking | #652 | #706 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce4 Ti 4600 and GeForce FX 5200SE
