GeForce4 Ti 4600 vs Quadro FX 500/FX 600

NVIDIA

GeForce4 Ti 4600

2010Core: 675 MHz
Similar parts
······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce4 Ti 4600 vs Quadro FX 500/FX 600 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce4 Ti 4600 vs Quadro FX 500/FX 600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce4 Ti 4600 vs Quadro FX 500/FX 600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce4 Ti 4600

2010

Why buy it

  • Costs $50 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
  • Draws 160W instead of 189W, a 29W reduction.
  • More future proof: Fermi (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (6 vs 8).
  • Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

2008

Why buy it

  • +33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Delivers 18.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • 3100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 18.1% higher power demand at 189W vs 160W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (8 vs 6), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce4 Ti 4600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 40nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2010 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX 500/FX 600 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 more expensive on MSRP at $449 vs $399, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 18.5% (0.0 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce4 Ti 4600 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce4 Ti 4600 vs Quadro FX 500/FX 600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce4 Ti 4600

The GeForce4 Ti 4600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 12 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $229.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 Ti 4600 scores 6 versus the Quadro FX 500/FX 600's 8 — the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce4 Ti 4600 is built on Fermi while the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 336 (GeForce4 Ti 4600) vs 240 (Quadro FX 500/FX 600). Raw compute: 0.9072 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4600) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 500/FX 600).

FeatureGeForce4 Ti 4600Quadro FX 500/FX 600
G3D Mark Score
6
8+33%
Architecture
Fermi
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
40 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
336+40%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.9072 TFLOPS+46%
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
56
80+43%
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce4 Ti 4600 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce4 Ti 4600Quadro FX 500/FX 600
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce4 Ti 4600 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 carries 4 GB. Quadro FX 500/FX 600 gives you 3100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4600 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 500/FX 600. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce4 Ti 4600) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 500/FX 600) — the GeForce4 Ti 4600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce4 Ti 4600Quadro FX 500/FX 600
VRAM Capacity
0.125 GB
4 GB+3100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce4 Ti 4600 draws 160W versus the Quadro FX 500/FX 600's 189W — a 16.6% difference. The GeForce4 Ti 4600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4600) vs 350W (Quadro FX 500/FX 600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce4 Ti 4600Quadro FX 500/FX 600
TDP
160W-15%
189W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
216mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
65°C
Perf/Watt
0.0
0.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce4 Ti 4600 came in at $399, while the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 launched at $449. On MSRP, GeForce4 Ti 4600 was 11.1% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce4 Ti 4600) vs 0.0 (Quadro FX 500/FX 600) — the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is GeForce4 Ti 4600 (2010 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce4 Ti 4600Quadro FX 500/FX 600
MSRP
$399-11%
$449
Performance per Dollar
0.0
0.0
Codename
GF104
GT200B
Release
July 12 2010
November 11 2008
Ranking
#652
#815

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.