CPU
GPU
GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
Popular choices:
GeForce4 440 Go 64M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is positioned at rank 384 and the GeForce4 440 Go 64M is on rank 741, so the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
Performance Per Dollar GeForce4 440 Go 64M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 16.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce4 440 Go 64M.
| Insight | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE | GeForce4 440 Go 64M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+16.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-16.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE and GeForce4 440 Go 64M
GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
The GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 15 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7 points. Launch price was $160.
GeForce4 440 Go 64M
The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is Up to 710 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE scores 7 versus the GeForce4 440 Go 64M's 6 — the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE leads by 16.7%. The GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is built on Fermi while the GeForce4 440 Go 64M uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 288 (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE) vs 384 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Raw compute: 0.7488 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE) vs 0.5445 TFLOPS (GeForce4 440 Go 64M).
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE | GeForce4 440 Go 64M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7+17% | 6 |
| Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 288 | 384+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7488 TFLOPS+38% | 0.5445 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 48+50% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB+1100% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE | GeForce4 440 Go 64M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE) vs 256 KB (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) — the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE | GeForce4 440 Go 64M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE) vs 7.0 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 1.3 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE | GeForce4 440 Go 64M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 8.1+16% | 7.0 |
| Vulkan | None | N/A |
| OpenGL | 1.3 | 1.5+15% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE) vs None (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Decoder: No vs MPEG-2 VPE.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE | GeForce4 440 Go 64M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | None |
| Decoder | No | MPEG-2 VPE |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE draws 150W versus the GeForce4 440 Go 64M's 32W — a 129.7% difference. The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE) vs 350W (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 216mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE | GeForce4 440 Go 64M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 32W-79% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 216mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-24% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE | GeForce4 440 Go 64M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | — |
| Codename | GF104 | GK107 |
| Release | November 15 2010 | October 1 2012 |
| Ranking | #683 | #903 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE and GeForce4 440 Go 64M
