CPU
GPU
GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
Popular choices:
RADEON IGP 350M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is positioned at rank 384 and the RADEON IGP 350M is on rank 328, so the RADEON IGP 350M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
Performance Per Dollar RADEON IGP 350M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON IGP 350M is significantly newer (2016 vs 2010). The RADEON IGP 350M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 16.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON IGP 350M.
| Insight | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE | RADEON IGP 350M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+16.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-16.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE and RADEON IGP 350M
GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
The GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 15 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7 points. Launch price was $160.
RADEON IGP 350M
The RADEON IGP 350M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 6 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE scores 7 versus the RADEON IGP 350M's 6 — the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE leads by 16.7%. The GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is built on Fermi while the RADEON IGP 350M uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 288 (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE) vs 512 (RADEON IGP 350M). Raw compute: 0.7488 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (RADEON IGP 350M).
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE | RADEON IGP 350M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7+17% | 6 |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 288 | 512+78% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7488 TFLOPS | 0.8192 TFLOPS+9% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 48+50% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB+200% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE | RADEON IGP 350M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE) vs 256 KB (RADEON IGP 350M) — the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE | RADEON IGP 350M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE draws 150W versus the RADEON IGP 350M's 55W — a 92.7% difference. The RADEON IGP 350M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE) vs 350W (RADEON IGP 350M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE | RADEON IGP 350M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 55W-63% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 216mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON IGP 350M is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE | RADEON IGP 350M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | — |
| Codename | GF104 | Cape Verde |
| Release | November 15 2010 | July 6 2016 |
| Ranking | #683 | #667 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE and RADEON IGP 350M
