GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE vs RADEON IGP 350M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE vs RADEON IGP 350M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE vs RADEON IGP 350M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE

2010

Why buy it

✅+16.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌172.7% higher power demand at 150W vs 55W.

RADEON IGP 350M

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 55W instead of 150W, a 95W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6 vs 7).
❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 16.7% in PassMark G3D (7 vs 6), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE vs RADEON IGP 350M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE

The GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 15 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7 points. Launch price was $160.

RADEON IGP 350M

The RADEON IGP 350M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 6 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE scores 7 versus the RADEON IGP 350M's 6 — the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE leads by 16.7%. The GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is built on Fermi while the RADEON IGP 350M uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 288 (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE) vs 512 (RADEON IGP 350M). Raw compute: 0.7488 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (RADEON IGP 350M).

Feature	GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE	RADEON IGP 350M
G3D Mark Score	7+17%	6
Architecture	Fermi	GCN 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	288	512+78%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7488 TFLOPS	0.8192 TFLOPS+9%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	48+50%	32
L1 Cache	384 KB+200%	128 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON IGP 350M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE	RADEON IGP 350M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE and 64-bit on the RADEON IGP 350M. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE) vs 256 KB (RADEON IGP 350M) — the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE	RADEON IGP 350M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE draws 150W versus the RADEON IGP 350M's 55W — a 92.7% difference. The RADEON IGP 350M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE) vs 350W (RADEON IGP 350M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE	RADEON IGP 350M
TDP	150W	55W-63%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	216mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	65°C	—
Perf/Watt	0.0	0.1

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RADEON IGP 350M (2016 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE	RADEON IGP 350M
MSRP	$299	—
Codename	GF104	Cape Verde
Release	November 15 2010	July 6 2016
Ranking	#683	#667

Search GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE on Amazon

Search RADEON IGP 350M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.