GRID K160Q vs GeForce 9800 S
GRID K160Q
Popular choices:
GeForce 9800 S
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID K160Q is positioned at rank 213 and the GeForce 9800 S is on rank 510, so the GRID K160Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID K160Q
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9800 S
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 9800 S is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID K160Q.
| Insight | GRID K160Q | GeForce 9800 S |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GRID K160Q offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GRID K160Q holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $40), it costs 25% less, resulting in a 31.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID K160Q | GeForce 9800 S |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+31.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID K160Q and GeForce 9800 S
GRID K160Q
The GRID K160Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 628 points. Launch price was $937.
GeForce 9800 S
The GeForce 9800 S is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 636 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID K160Q scores 628 and the GeForce 9800 S reaches 636 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K160Q is built on Kepler while the GeForce 9800 S uses G9x, both on 28 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K160Q) vs 224 (GeForce 9800 S).
| Feature | GRID K160Q | GeForce 9800 S |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 628 | 636+1% |
| Architecture | Kepler | G9x |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+586% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID K160Q | GeForce 9800 S |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GRID K160Q | GeForce 9800 S |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID K160Q draws 225W versus the GeForce 9800 S's 150W — a 40% difference. The GeForce 9800 S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K160Q) vs 350W (GeForce 9800 S). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | GRID K160Q | GeForce 9800 S |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 150W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 2.8 | 4.2+50% |
Value Analysis
The GRID K160Q launched at $125 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GeForce 9800 S launched at $150 and now averages $40. The GRID K160Q costs 25% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 20.9 (GRID K160Q) vs 15.9 (GeForce 9800 S) — the GRID K160Q offers 31.4% better value. The GRID K160Q is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | GRID K160Q | GeForce 9800 S |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $125-17% | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-25% | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.9+31% | 15.9 |
| Codename | GK104 | NB9E-GTX |
| Release | June 28 2013 | July 15 2008 |
| Ranking | #589 | #825 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID K160Q and GeForce 9800 S
