GRID K180Q vs FirePro 3D V7750
GRID K180Q
Popular choices:
FirePro 3D V7750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID K180Q is positioned at rank 381 and the FirePro 3D V7750 is on rank 371, so the FirePro 3D V7750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID K180Q
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V7750
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro 3D V7750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID K180Q.
| Insight | GRID K180Q | FirePro 3D V7750 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro 3D V7750 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro 3D V7750 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $1,000), it costs 98% less, resulting in a 5003% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID K180Q | FirePro 3D V7750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+5003%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,000) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID K180Q and FirePro 3D V7750
GRID K180Q
The GRID K180Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 534 points. Launch price was $1,875.
FirePro 3D V7750
The FirePro 3D V7750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 545 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID K180Q scores 534 and the FirePro 3D V7750 reaches 545 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K180Q is built on Kepler while the FirePro 3D V7750 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K180Q) vs 2,048 (FirePro 3D V7750). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K180Q) vs 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V7750).
| Feature | GRID K180Q | FirePro 3D V7750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 534 | 545+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2048+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.289 TFLOPS | 3.482 TFLOPS+52% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 512 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID K180Q | FirePro 3D V7750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID K180Q comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro 3D V7750 has 1 GB. The FirePro 3D V7750 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GRID K180Q) vs 768 KB (FirePro 3D V7750) — the FirePro 3D V7750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID K180Q | FirePro 3D V7750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID K180Q draws 225W versus the FirePro 3D V7750's 274W — a 19.6% difference. The GRID K180Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K180Q) vs 350W (FirePro 3D V7750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID K180Q | FirePro 3D V7750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W-18% | 274W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 234mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 2.4+20% | 2.0 |
Value Analysis
The GRID K180Q launched at $1000 MSRP and currently averages $1000, while the FirePro 3D V7750 launched at $799 and now averages $20. The FirePro 3D V7750 costs 98% less ($980 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.5 (GRID K180Q) vs 27.3 (FirePro 3D V7750) — the FirePro 3D V7750 offers 5360% better value. The FirePro 3D V7750 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | GRID K180Q | FirePro 3D V7750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000 | $799-20% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1000 | $20-98% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.5 | 27.3+5360% |
| Codename | GK104 | Tahiti |
| Release | June 28 2013 | January 18 2014 |
| Ranking | #595 | #423 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID K180Q and FirePro 3D V7750
