GRID M10-0B vs Radeon R7 A10-8750

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID M10-0B is positioned at rank 403 and the Radeon R7 A10-8750 is on rank 281, so the Radeon R7 A10-8750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-0B

#388

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

67150%

#403

GRID M10-0B

MSRP: $4000|Avg: $1000

100%

#404

Quadro FX 4600

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $50

91%

#406

GRID K340

MSRP: $3299|Avg: $57

91%

#407

Quadro FX 5600

MSRP: $2999|Avg: $50

82%

#409

Quadro FX 3500

MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599

77%

#410

Quadro FX 1400

MSRP: $799|Avg: $30

73%

#411

GRID K1

MSRP: $4140|Avg: $120

73%

#413

GRID P4-1Q

MSRP: $5890|Avg: $185

55%

#414

GRID RTX6000-2Q

MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1500

45%

#417

GRID M60-0B

MSRP: $19900|Avg: $19900

41%

#418

Quadro FX 5500

MSRP: $2999|Avg: $30

36%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A10-8750

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

2121%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

2038%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

2014%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

2011%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

2006%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

1995%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

1970%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

1963%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

1944%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

1939%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

1916%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

1912%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

1877%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

1876%

#266

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

2339%

#281

Radeon R7 A10-8750

MSRP: $250|Avg: $30

100%

#282

Radeon HD 6410D

MSRP: $70|Avg: $70

99%

#283

Radeon HD 3850 AGP

MSRP: $130|Avg: $130

97%

#285

Radeon R9 M280X

MSRP: $250|Avg: $50

95%

#286

Radeon HD 5470

MSRP: $83|Avg: $83

94%

#287

GeForce GT 220

MSRP: $69|Avg: $49

94%

#288

Radeon R7 A10-8850

MSRP: $250|Avg: $250

90%

#290

GeForce G210

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

87%

#291

Radeon HD 4850 X2

MSRP: $399|Avg: $40

83%

#292

Radeon HD 4330

MSRP: $50|Avg: $9

79%

#293

GeForce GTX 260

MSRP: $449|Avg: $449

78%

#294

Radeon HD 8490

MSRP: $99|Avg: $35

78%

#295

Radeon HD 8650D

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

77%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GRID M10-0B is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 A10-8750.

Insight	GRID M10-0B	Radeon R7 A10-8750
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R7 A10-8750 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 A10-8750 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $1,000), it costs 97% less, resulting in a 3175.9% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GRID M10-0B	Radeon R7 A10-8750
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+3175.9%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,000)	✅More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GRID M10-0B Benchmark Check

Radeon R7 A10-8750 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GRID M10-0B and Radeon R7 A10-8750

GRID M10-0B

The GRID M10-0B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 871 points.

Radeon R7 A10-8750

The Radeon R7 A10-8750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 6 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 856 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID M10-0B scores 871 and the Radeon R7 A10-8750 reaches 856 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-0B is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R7 A10-8750 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GRID M10-0B) vs 512 (Radeon R7 A10-8750). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-0B) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A10-8750).

Feature	GRID M10-0B	Radeon R7 A10-8750
G3D Mark Score	871+2%	856
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	640+25%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.672 TFLOPS+104%	0.8192 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	40+25%	32
L1 Cache	320 KB+150%	128 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID M10-0B	Radeon R7 A10-8750
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-0B) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 A10-8750) — the GRID M10-0B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID M10-0B	Radeon R7 A10-8750
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M10-0B draws 225W versus the Radeon R7 A10-8750's 55W — a 121.4% difference. The Radeon R7 A10-8750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-0B) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A10-8750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	GRID M10-0B	Radeon R7 A10-8750
TDP	225W	55W-76%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Perf/Watt	3.9	15.6+300%

💰

Value Analysis

The GRID M10-0B launched at $4000 MSRP and currently averages $1000, while the Radeon R7 A10-8750 launched at $250 and now averages $30. The Radeon R7 A10-8750 costs 97% less ($970 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.9 (GRID M10-0B) vs 28.5 (Radeon R7 A10-8750) — the Radeon R7 A10-8750 offers 3066.7% better value.