GRID M3-3020 vs GRID M10-1Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M3-3020 vs GRID M10-1Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID M3-3020 vs GRID M10-1Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M3-3020

2016

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GRID M10-1Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID M3-3020 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 4.8% in PassMark G3D (2,500 vs 2,385), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID M3-3020 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2016 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID M3-3020 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GRID M3-3020 vs GRID M10-1Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M3-3020

The GRID M3-3020 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,500 points.

GRID M10-1Q

The GRID M10-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,385 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID M3-3020 scores 2,500 and the GRID M10-1Q reaches 2,385 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M3-3020 is built on Maxwell while the GRID M10-1Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GRID M3-3020) vs 2,048 (GRID M10-1Q). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M3-3020) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-1Q). Boost clocks: 1306 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

Feature	GRID M3-3020	GRID M10-1Q
G3D Mark Score	2,500+5%	2,385
Architecture	Maxwell	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	640	2048+220%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.672 TFLOPS	4.825 TFLOPS+189%
Boost Clock	1306 MHz+11%	1178 MHz
ROPs	16	64+300%
TMUs	40	128+220%
L1 Cache	320 KB	768 KB+140%
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID M3-3020	GRID M10-1Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M3-3020 and 64-bit on the GRID M10-1Q.

Feature	GRID M3-3020	GRID M10-1Q
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M3-3020 draws 250W versus the GRID M10-1Q's 225W — a 10.5% difference. The GRID M10-1Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M3-3020) vs 350W (GRID M10-1Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID M3-3020	GRID M10-1Q
TDP	250W	225W-10%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	267mm
Slots	—	2
Perf/Watt	10.0	10.6+6%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M3-3020 came in at $1000, while the GRID M10-1Q launched at $0. On MSRP, GRID M10-1Q was 100+% cheaper ($1000 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (GRID M3-3020) vs Infinity (GRID M10-1Q) — the GRID M10-1Q offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GRID M3-3020 (2016 vs 2015).

Feature	GRID M3-3020	GRID M10-1Q
MSRP	$1000	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	2.5	Infinity
Codename	GM107	GM204
Release	May 18 2016	August 30 2015
Ranking	#587	#525

Search GRID M3-3020 on Amazon

Search GRID M10-1Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.