GeForce GTX 950M vs GRID M3-3020

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 950M vs GRID M3-3020 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 950M vs GRID M3-3020: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 950M

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).

GRID M3-3020

2016

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 950M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3% in PassMark G3D (2,575 vs 2,500), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 950M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID M3-3020 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID M3-3020 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 950M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 950M vs GRID M3-3020 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 950M

The GeForce GTX 950M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 914 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,575 points.

GRID M3-3020

The GRID M3-3020 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,500 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 950M scores 2,575 and the GRID M3-3020 reaches 2,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 950M is built on Maxwell while the GRID M3-3020 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 950M) vs 640 (GRID M3-3020). Raw compute: 1.439 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950M) vs 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M3-3020). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1306 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950M	GRID M3-3020
G3D Mark Score	2,575+3%	2,500
Architecture	Maxwell	Maxwell
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	640	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.439 TFLOPS	1.672 TFLOPS+16%
Boost Clock	1124 MHz	1306 MHz+16%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	40	40
L1 Cache	320 KB	320 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 950M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID M3-3020 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950M	GRID M3-3020
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 950M and 64-bit on the GRID M3-3020.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950M	GRID M3-3020
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 950M draws 75W versus the GRID M3-3020's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 950M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 950M) vs 350W (GRID M3-3020). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950M	GRID M3-3020
TDP	75W-70%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	34.3+243%	10.0

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GRID M3-3020 (2016 vs 2015).

Feature	GeForce GTX 950M	GRID M3-3020
MSRP	—	$1000
Codename	GM107	GM107
Release	March 13 2015	May 18 2016
Ranking	#626	#587

Search GeForce GTX 950M on Amazon

Search GRID M3-3020 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.