GeForce GTX 950M vs Radeon HD 8770

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 950M

2015Core: 914 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 8770

2013Core: 775 MHzBoost: 825 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 950M vs Radeon HD 8770 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 950M vs Radeon HD 8770 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 950M vs Radeon HD 8770: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 950M

2015

Why buy it

  • 95.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 17.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • 50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

Radeon HD 8770

2013

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 950M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 950M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 95.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 8770 instead at 2,607 vs 2,575, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 950M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 8770 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 8770 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 950M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 950M vs Radeon HD 8770 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 950M

The GeForce GTX 950M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 914 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,575 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 8770

The Radeon HD 8770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 775 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,607 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 950M scores 2,575 and the Radeon HD 8770 reaches 2,607 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 950M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 8770 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 950M) vs 384 (Radeon HD 8770). Raw compute: 1.439 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950M) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8770). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 825 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 950MRadeon HD 8770
G3D Mark Score
2,575
2,607+1%
Architecture
Maxwell
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
640+67%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.439 TFLOPS+127%
0.6336 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1124 MHz+36%
825 MHz
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
40+67%
24
L1 Cache
320 KB+233%
96 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 950M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 8770 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 950MRadeon HD 8770
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 950M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8770. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 950M) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 8770) — the GeForce GTX 950M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 950MRadeon HD 8770
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
96 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 950M draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 8770's 50W — a 40% difference. The Radeon HD 8770 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 950M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8770). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce GTX 950MRadeon HD 8770
TDP
75W
50W-33%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Length
240mm
Slots
2
Perf/Watt
34.3
52.1+52%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 950M (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 950MRadeon HD 8770
MSRP
$150
Codename
GM107
Mars
Release
March 13 2015
April 1 2013
Ranking
#626
#844

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.