
FirePro R5000
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 950M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
FirePro R5000
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,099 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 950M
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,099 MSRP).
FirePro R5000
2013GeForce GTX 950M
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,099 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,099 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is FirePro R5000 better than GeForce GTX 950M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 950M make more sense than FirePro R5000?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FirePro R5000 | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FirePro R5000 | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 113 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 18 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 22 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 15 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 4 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FirePro R5000 | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 29 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FirePro R5000 | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro R5000 and GeForce GTX 950M

FirePro R5000
FirePro R5000
The FirePro R5000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,647 points. Launch price was $1,099.

GeForce GTX 950M
GeForce GTX 950M
The GeForce GTX 950M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 914 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,575 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro R5000 scores 2,647 and the GeForce GTX 950M reaches 2,575 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro R5000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 950M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (FirePro R5000) vs 640 (GeForce GTX 950M). Raw compute: 1.267 TFLOPS (FirePro R5000) vs 1.439 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950M).
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,647+3% | 2,575 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+20% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.267 TFLOPS | 1.439 TFLOPS+14% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 48+20% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 320 KB+67% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 950M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The FirePro R5000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro R5000 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 950M has 2 GB. The FirePro R5000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro R5000) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 950M) — the GeForce GTX 950M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro R5000 draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 950M's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 950M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro R5000) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 950M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 75W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 279mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 17.6 | 34.3+95% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 950M is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1099 | — |
| Codename | Pitcairn | GM107 |
| Release | February 25 2013 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #619 | #626 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













