GeForce GTX 950M vs MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 950M vs MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 950M vs MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 950M

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

2012

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.4% in PassMark G3D (2,637 vs 2,575), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 950M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 950M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 950M vs MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 950M

The GeForce GTX 950M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 914 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,575 points.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,637 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 950M scores 2,575 and the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M reaches 2,637 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 950M is built on Maxwell while the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 950M) vs 384 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). Raw compute: 1.439 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950M) vs 0.9523 TFLOPS (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 950M	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
G3D Mark Score	2,575	2,637+2%
Architecture	Maxwell	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	640+67%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.439 TFLOPS+51%	0.9523 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	40	64+60%
L1 Cache	320 KB	512 KB+60%
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 950M	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 950M and 64-bit on the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 950M) vs 0.5 MB (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) — the GeForce GTX 950M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950M	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 950M draws 75W versus the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M's 100W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 950M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 950M) vs 350W (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.