GeForce GTX 950M vs Radeon Pro WX 3100

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 950M vs Radeon Pro WX 3100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 950M vs Radeon Pro WX 3100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 950M

2015

Why buy it

✅19.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 13.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌15.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 65W.

Radeon Pro WX 3100

2017

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 65W instead of 75W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 950M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 950M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 19.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon Pro WX 3100 instead at 2,584 vs 2,575, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 950M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Pro WX 3100 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro WX 3100 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 950M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 950M vs Radeon Pro WX 3100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 950M

The GeForce GTX 950M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 914 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,575 points.

Radeon Pro WX 3100

The Radeon Pro WX 3100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 12 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,584 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 950M scores 2,575 and the Radeon Pro WX 3100 reaches 2,584 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 950M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon Pro WX 3100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 950M) vs 512 (Radeon Pro WX 3100). Raw compute: 1.439 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950M) vs 1.248 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 3100). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1219 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950M	Radeon Pro WX 3100
G3D Mark Score	2,575	2,584
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	640+25%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.439 TFLOPS+15%	1.248 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1124 MHz	1219 MHz+8%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	40+25%	32
L1 Cache	320 KB+150%	128 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 950M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro WX 3100 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950M	Radeon Pro WX 3100
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 950M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 3100 carries 4 GB. Radeon Pro WX 3100 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 950M and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 3100. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 950M) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon Pro WX 3100) — the GeForce GTX 950M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950M	Radeon Pro WX 3100
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 950M draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro WX 3100's 65W — a 14.3% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 3100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 950M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 3100). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950M	Radeon Pro WX 3100
TDP	75W	65W-13%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	—	168mm
Height	—	69mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	—	80°C
Perf/Watt	34.3	39.8+16%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 3100 (2017 vs 2015).

Feature	GeForce GTX 950M	Radeon Pro WX 3100
MSRP	—	$199
Codename	GM107	Lexa
Release	March 13 2015	June 12 2017
Ranking	#626	#624

Search GeForce GTX 950M on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro WX 3100 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.