
GRID M3-3020

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
GRID M3-3020 vs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID M3-3020 vs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GRID M3-3020 vs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID M3-3020
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GRID M3-3020 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌792.9% higher power demand at 250W vs 28W.
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 250W, a 222W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID M3-3020 vs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M3-3020
The GRID M3-3020 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,500 points.

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 48 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,400 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M3-3020 scores 2,500 and the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs reaches 2,400 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M3-3020 is built on Maxwell while the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 640 (GRID M3-3020) vs 48 (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs). Boost clocks: 1306 MHz vs 1450 MHz.
| Feature | GRID M3-3020 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,500+4% | 2,400 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+1233% | 48 |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | 1450 MHz+11% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M3-3020 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID M3-3020 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs carries 0 MB. GRID M3-3020 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M3-3020 and System on the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs.
| Feature | GRID M3-3020 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M3-3020 draws 250W versus the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs's 28W — a 159.7% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M3-3020) vs 1W (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | GRID M3-3020 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 28W-89% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 10.0 | 85.7+757% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID M3-3020 came in at $1000, while the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs launched at $0. On MSRP, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs was 100+% cheaper ($1000 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (GRID M3-3020) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs) — the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | GRID M3-3020 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.5 | Infinity |
| Codename | GM107 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | May 18 2016 | August 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #587 | #712 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














