GRID M3-3020 vs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

GRID M3-3020

2016Core: 1033 MHzBoost: 1306 MHz
VS
Intel

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

2020Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1450 MHz

GRID M3-3020 vs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M3-3020 vs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M3-3020

2016

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GRID M3-3020 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 792.9% higher power demand at 250W vs 28W.

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

2020

Why buy it

  • Draws 28W instead of 250W, a 222W reduction.
  • More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GRID M3-3020 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 4.2% in PassMark G3D (2,500 vs 2,400), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GRID M3-3020 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID M3-3020 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GRID M3-3020 vs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID M3-3020

The GRID M3-3020 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,500 points.

Intel

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 48 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,400 points.

Graphics Performance

The GRID M3-3020 scores 2,500 and the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs reaches 2,400 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M3-3020 is built on Maxwell while the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 640 (GRID M3-3020) vs 48 (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs). Boost clocks: 1306 MHz vs 1450 MHz.

FeatureGRID M3-3020UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
G3D Mark Score
2,500+4%
2,400
Architecture
Maxwell
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Process Node
28 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
640+1233%
48
Boost Clock
1306 MHz
1450 MHz+11%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID M3-3020UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID M3-3020 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs carries 0 MB. GRID M3-3020 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M3-3020 and System on the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs.

FeatureGRID M3-3020UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M3-3020 draws 250W versus the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs's 28W — a 159.7% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M3-3020) vs 1W (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

FeatureGRID M3-3020UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
TDP
250W
28W-89%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
10.0
85.7+757%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M3-3020 came in at $1000, while the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs launched at $0. On MSRP, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs was 100+% cheaper ($1000 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (GRID M3-3020) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs) — the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (2020 vs 2016).

FeatureGRID M3-3020UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
MSRP
$1000
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
2.5
Infinity
Codename
GM107
Tiger Lake Xe
Release
May 18 2016
August 15 2020
Ranking
#587
#712

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.